Authenticity First

Unapologetic.

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@ArchieHicoxGB @nomad_dissident @BBCMOTD Gordon I believe

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@_fzn9 @HardenBetter_ Still not gonna respond? Tell me, why are there explicitly contradictory Qurans as part of the one thing we know as Quran? Are you not the same people always complaining about Jesus’ supposedly contradictory natures?

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A Still waiting for you to demonstrate why any supposed prophecies of a prophet after Jesus simply had to be Muhammad to the Christians of his time and not someone after him who wouldn’t contradict core elements of their theology.

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A Whether the Gospel is corrupted or not according to you guys isn’t the point. If the Gospel itself as we have it teaches universal salvation for works, belief in a Unitarian God and belief in the last day, then surely it doesn’t really matter that much

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A Yes. If he was needed IF the New Testament taught Unitarianism and how to go to heaven even from a Muslim paradigm. God wouldn’t require a new prophet to fulfill prophecy as one of his reasons without the other reasons you listed was my point.

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A 1. It is. If there’s no need for a new prophet in the first place, then there’s obviously no need for fulfilled prophecy of said prophet.

2. Elab

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A I’ve already explained that it likely would have required something like a specific timeline pointing to the time of Muhammad or exactly what he’s going to do with the scriptures.

Which ones do you wanna pick. We can go one by one.

They can’t have used rigorous logic sadly.

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A The way you used ‘possible’ has been misleading this entire time. Like obviously if the hypothetical was undeniably specific as the example I gave (which we both know it isn’t) that makes it ‘possible’.

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A Again, the actual prophecy itself would have to be only about Muhammad and not possibly about someone other than him after him if he’s gonna come and change the theology already established by Christians.

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A It was.

This ‘externally verifiable’ cope is easily addressed by the fact that, unless it’s INCREDIBLY specific, it’s more parsimonious that this guy is just an imposter as opposed to truly a prophet who is making supposedly corrupted books an authority on his claims.

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A

[Authenticity First @Afirst05]

@SorryAyy @TaymiApologia @furemis_A Mind you, I’m still waiting on an explanation that doesn’t presuppose Islam in some manner for Muhammad being prophesied.