GPT-5.6 Sol and Luna are ahead of Terra at every point on the Intelligence vs Cost per Task chart. GPT-5.6 Luna stands out as a particularly cost efficient model
Charting the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index shows the trade-off between intelligence and Cost per Intelligence Index Task. Across reasoning efforts, each GPT-5.6 model pushes past GPT-5.5 on the Pareto frontier (excluding non-reasoning).
However, Luna and Sol are always ahead of Terra. This means for any Terra effort level, there is a Luna or Sol effort level that is more intelligent at no extra cost, or as intelligent at lower cost.
@andrewmccalip@souvikdeb26@andrewmccalip - I also got blocked today for normal usage. Granted I am a high volume user so I always expected your circadian rythm algorythm was going to not like me but how do I fix this? I clicked appeal decision but my earn rate has dropped to 0.
Happy to share prompts.
https://t.co/U6fnYF0g6x actually paid out
I opted into ads in my code editor and real money showed up
somehow @andrewmccalip's weird little hobby project feels like it stumbled into a better incentive model https://t.co/I26IbjboKL
How Australia Can Help Make SpaceX’s 10,000 Starship Launches/Year a Reality @humanspaceflight
Elon’s vision for Starship at aircraft-like cadence—~one launch per hour—is the key to millions of tons to orbit, point-to-point Earth transport, lunar bases, and a self-sustaining Mars city. Australia is perfectly positioned to be a critical global partner. Here’s how we can step up:
1. Build World-Class Launch & Recovery Sites
• Equatorial advantage: Sites like Arnhem Space Centre (NT, near Nhulunbuy) or Cape York/Weipa (QLD) are close to the equator. This gives rockets a rotational boost, reducing fuel needs for heavy payloads and enabling more frequent ops. https://t.co/CLk9P2Qb0t
• Polar/Southern sites: Whalers Way (SA) and potential WA locations excel for sun-synchronous and polar orbits—vital for Earth observation, comms, and Starship redundancy. https://t.co/uiegfL9FqZ
• Recovery hubs: SpaceX is already exploring Starship splashdowns and towing recoveries off Australia’s coast. Turn that into landing pads + refurb facilities for rapid reuse. https://t.co/ntlBBi3km1
The 2023 US-Australia Technology Safeguards Agreement already green-lights American vehicles like Starship from Aussie soil. https://t.co/CLk9P2Qb0t
2. Local Manufacturing & Supply Chain
• Scale production of Starship components, heat shields, or Raptor engines via partnerships with Australian firms (e.g., Gilmour Space’s Bowen Orbital Spaceport and Eris program). https://t.co/BOR266IN8q
• Leverage our mining superpower: Refine propellants, source materials, and use lithium resources (hello, CrystalCore vibes) for energy storage at launch sites and future orbital infrastructure.
• Create thousands of high-tech jobs in regional areas—from engineers in QLD/NT to logistics in SA/WA—while building sovereign capability.
3. Policy, Investment & Collaboration
• Fast-track approvals and incentives for multi-pad spaceports (multiple sites = resilience against weather, range conflicts, or high cadence).
• Government + private investment: Expand existing ports (ELA, Southern Launch, Space Centre Australia) into Starship-scale facilities with horizontal integration, tank farms, and rapid turnaround.
• Training pipelines: Partner with unis and TAFEs for aerospace skills, attracting global talent.
• Defence & commercial synergy: Starship’s point-to-point potential boosts national security and disaster response. https://t.co/uiegfL9FqZ
Australia already has heritage (Woomera, NASA suborbital launches) and the geography. By becoming “Starbase Down Under,” we turn red dust into rocket fuel, prosperity, and a multiplanetary future. https://t.co/h7dLc4DMKF
This isn’t just hosting launches—it’s claiming a seat at humanity’s next chapter. From Dreamtime to deep space.
Let’s make it happen. Who’s with us? 🇦🇺🚀 #Starship #AustraliaInSpace #Multiplanetary
Regarding the OpenAI case, the judge & jury never actually ruled on the merits of the case, just on a calendar technicality.
There is no question to anyone following the case in detail that Altman & Brockman did in fact enrich themselves by stealing a charity. The only question is WHEN they did it!
I will be filing an appeal with the Ninth Circuit, because creating a precedent to loot charities is incredibly destructive to charitable giving in America.
OpenAI was founded to benefit all of humanity.
Introducing: PlayerZero
The world's first Engineering World Model that puts debugging, fixing, and testing your code on autopilot.
We've raised $20M from Foundation Capital, @matei_zaharia (Databricks), @pbailis (Workday), @rauchg (Vercel), @zoink (Figma), @drewhouston (Dropbox), and more
PlayerZero frees up 30% of your engineering bandwidth by:
1. Finding the root cause for bugs & incidents in minutes that engineering teams take days to identify.
2. Predicting in minutes, edge case issues that a 300-person QA team would take weeks to find.
------
Here's why this matters:
No one in your org has a complete picture of how your production software actually behaves.
Support sees tickets. SRE sees infra. Dev sees code. Each team builds their own fragmented view - and none of these systems talk to each other. When something breaks, everyone scrambles to stitch the picture together by hand.
PlayerZero connects all of it into a single context graph -
→ The Slack thread where your lead said "we went with X because Y fell apart in prod last time"
→ The PR review where an engineer explained the tradeoff
→ The lifetime history of your CI/CD pipeline, observability stack, incidents, and support tickets
So you can trace any problem to its root cause across every silo.
And it compounds. Every incident diagnosed teaches the model something new. The longer it runs, the deeper it understands - which code paths are high-risk, which configurations are fragile, which changes tend to break which customer flows.
So when you sit down to debug a live issue, you have your entire org's collective reasoning and production memory behind you - instantly.
------
Zuora, Georgia-Pacific, and Nylas have reduced resolution time by 90% and caught 95% of breaking changes and freeing an average of $30M in engineering bandwidth.
------
Our guarantee:
If we can't increase your engineering bandwidth by at least 20% within one week, we'll donate $10,000 to an open-source project of your choice.
Book a demo - https://t.co/dH1dulIwSS
This is just SO typical Google
Engineers inside the company get inconvenienced but something - eg a spike in usage
So they just silently ban paying users, deserved or not
No communicating with the or the source of the problem (eg OpenClaw)
This is why Google is hard to trust