Alberto di Martino

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

vademecum di lavoro per tempi bui, in abbozzo

[Francesco Vignarca @kkvignarca]

Non mi spiegherò mai perché la destra (con tutti i soldi, le connessioni, i sostegni del potere che ha) debba sempre finire con lo scegliersi dei propagandisti così scarsi e di basso livello… nemmeno in grado di “vendere bene” spin e panzane… penoso, questo

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

@AccademiaCrusca manca rif. a libro di A. Cadoppi, che usa l'espressione consapevolmente per un fenomeno nuovo. sbaglia, ma tant'è: va considerato. per il resto, basterebbe dire che nessun matematico chiede di disegnare un triangolo geometrico, né un fantino dice che monta un cavallo equino.

[John Tasioulas @JTasioulas]

"Much of what has happened in business schools turned out to be the leading edge of a broader transformation: the corporatization of the university itself. Institutions now chase rankings, donors and corporate partnerships, tout their contributions to innovation and growth and treat everything else as overhead".

Intelligent piece, especially as to the self-serving myth of no conflict between profit-maximization and ethics.

https://t.co/TgX341iZRI

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

@kkvignarca beh, lui se lo dice da solo nell'epigrafe che accompagna la foto profilo (già, "prorpio quello")

[Elif Biber @elifbiber]

📍 In #Oxford tomorrow

I am delighted to be presenting my book, A Rights-Based Inter-Legal Approach to Artificial Intelligence (@hartpublishing ), tomorrow at the @EthicsInAI, @UniofOxford, as part of its Michaelmas Term Seminar Series.

It is a particular pleasure to be back in #Oxford after spending May and June last year as an Academic Visitor at the Institute, returning this time to discuss my monograph and some of its core arguments, with a particular focus on the rights-based inter-legal approach to #AI governance and its implications for fundamental and human rights and the #EU #AIAct.

Many thanks for the kind invitation and to everyone involved in organising the seminar!

I am very much looking forward to the exchange and discussion that follows.

📍 Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities
📅 Wednesday, 14 October 2026
🕧 12:30–13:30

🔗 More details, registration, and more from the Institute's excellent seminar series and upcoming events:

https://t.co/FmQ4iDz8H3

@uni_lu_FDEF @ICON_S_Benelux @IconsItalia @ICON__S @The_Digi_Con @StalsPisa @phd_sant

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

@MariuzzoAndrea sì, magari aggiungere rif normativi principali, spec. farli avere ai giornalisti che fan gli altoparlanti anziché i giornalisti.

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

this paper is out (open access). Criminal Law&Philosophy remains, however, well worth consulting, beyond, and perhaps in spite of, my article
https://t.co/HIK6JCadQd

[Claudio Giunta @ClaudioGiunta]

Perché a 15 anni è meglio leggere Il sistema periodico per intero che Manzoni a pezzi https://t.co/jBwHvDr8dH

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

@MariuzzoAndrea non è un organo rappresentativo però. sopratutto, non DEVE esserlo. Manca il presupposto logico dell'analogia. indipendentemente dall'essere per una o altra soluzione, impostare bene il problema è base ineludibile.

[Elif Biber @elifbiber]

🚨 NEW BOOK 𝐌𝐚𝐲 2026!
📘 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐟𝐬 (submitted)

𝐀 𝐑𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬-𝐁𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫-𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 (@hartpublishing #Oxford) is available for pre-order!

After many years of research – of questioning, refining, and returning again and again to how we can meaningfully protect fundamental rights in an increasingly digital world – I am delighted to be holding my first monograph in my hands. Seeing this work finally resting on my table means more to me than words can express.

This work offers the 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫-𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐀𝐈 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐬 — a topic that is becoming increasingly critical as AI continues to shape public decision-making.

I am truly grateful for the strong interest already shown across Europe and beyond, and I look forward to engaging in thoughtful and critical discussions around the arguments developed in the book. Together with Hart Publishing, we are also exploring the possibility of publishing the general overview of each chapter on SSRN — more on this soon.

🔗Learn more: https://t.co/1PiacTvKPS

@phd_sant @ScuolaSantAnna @The_Digi_Con @StalsPisa @ICONnectblog @ICON__S @nyulaw @EthicsInAI @EthicsinAI_AFP

[Elif Biber @elifbiber]

On Nov 18, we will gather at @SantAnnaPisa in Pisa to honor Prof. Gianluigi Palombella @gian_palombella — celebrating his extraordinary journey as a scholar and friend, and his lasting contributions to legal theory, fundamental rights, and the rule of law. Deeply grateful to my colleague and friend Guilherme Pratti @iugittarp for making this event possible.

@ICON__S @IconsItalia @AlbertodiMarti1
#LegalTheory #RuleOfLaw @phd_sant #fundamentalrights

[Alberto Alemanno 🇪🇺 @alemannoEU]

The motion of censure against von der Leyen isn’t about whether her Commission survives - it will -, but what Europe she’ll lead and how.

This motion goes to the heart of what the European Parliament has always been about: to hold the EU Commission democratically accountable. As such it offers mainstream pro European parties an unmissable opportunity to reclaim some control over @vonderleyen drift towards the far-right, at a time she needs a reliable parliamentary majority.

⚡ The Irony
Far-right triggered the motion over COVID vaccine transparency failures and bypassing Parliament on rearmament proposals.
Paradoxically, this gives disgruntled mainstream parties a platform to challenge von der Leyen’s rightward drift from her original centrist promises.

🎯 The Real Problem
von der Leyen promised to govern from the center but increasingly courts nationalist votes.
She’s caught between two incompatible parliamentary majorities - even Europe’s partners (US, China) don’t know which EU they’re dealing with.

💪 The Leverage
Even a failed vote gives mainstream parties unprecedented bargaining power - historical precedent proves it works.
(Mad cow inquiry + censure threat forced Santer Commission to step down voluntarily)
Without centrist support, vdL can’t deliver on massive upcoming priorities: EU budget, Draghi agenda, Letta’s single market completion, European rearmament.

🔥 The Stakes
This forces the choice: govern with the democratic center or keep drifting toward the nationalist right.
Europe needs clarity now - not political ambiguity when negotiating with Trump and managing Ukraine peace talks.

⚖️ The Bottom Line
Vote won’t succeed (as it requires 2/3 of votes cast, representing an absolute majority of 361 MEPs) but tests whether EU democracy prioritizes accountability over institutional loyalty.

Will mainstream parties use this rare moment to force Europe’s biggest political choice in decades? #vonderLeyen #MotionDeCensure #motionofcensure

[John Tasioulas @JTasioulas]

All the proof you need for why humanistic AI is not just an academic conceit.

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

@martinicogi @PAnnicchino pisa-napoli pure eh così si fa una scazzottata liberatoria

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

@albertomelloni o tempora o mores. o miserae sortis...

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

@gdcaiazza fate un po' di dignitoso lobbying per farvi invitare alle trasmissioni nazionalpopolari, almeno per fare un controcanto da scuola di canto. altrimenti ci sono i vocalizzatori demenziali, i cogl* intellettualmente castrati, e i magistrati tribunizi

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

@altreconomia quell'espressione non so se il presidente l ha detta. ma se è così, è una sciocchezza che la natura della fonte non rende per questo vera.

[Alberto di Martino @AlbertodiMarti1]

@altreconomia @tomasomontanari attenzione @altreconomia e @tomasomontanari. pf questi temi non riguardano basso gioco politico, confrontatevi in dialogo franco almeno con avv Caiazza. poi magari confermate le idee ma le formate con la stessa serietà scientifica usata (e ammirata) per la vostra disciplina.

[UoE Criminal Law Discussion Group @UoECrimLawDG]

Reminder for tomorrow’s event 📣

We are pleased to host Mark Dsouza, who will be presenting their paper: “Chosen Negligence”.

The event will now be hybrid. If you wish to attend but are not on the email list, feel free to get in touch with us for access to the links!