A follow up that repeats your first email repeats the reason it was ignored. Try a new subject, one fresh angle, half the length, and one small question. That is a follow up. #LinkBuildingForSaaS
If your follow up is just your first email again, it repeats the reason it was ignored. New subject, one fresh angle, half the length, one small question. That is a real follow up. #LinkBuildingForSaaS
If your follow up repeats your first email, it repeats the reason it was ignored. New subject, one fresh angle, half the length, one small question. That is a follow up. The rest is just a second copy. #LinkBuildingForSaaS
@Kevin_Indig Same lesson from the outreach side. A publisher that shows up in one AI tool may be invisible in another, so I spread placements across sources people actually trust instead of chasing one channel.
@CyrusShepard Exactly. Ranking alone is not enough anymore. I have seen pages sit on page one and still get skipped in AI answers when no trusted source backs up the same point.
@aleyda@SERanking This fits what I see in outreach too. Brand mentions outside the homepage matter more now, so I check where a publisher actually gets cited before I pitch, not just its homepage authority.
@semrush That checklist point about being present wherever people search is the one I see missed most in outreach. A mention on a trusted publisher that actually gets cited beats ten thin placements that no one references.
Traffic is a shop window, not proof of the right readers. Before you judge a publisher, check who reads it, what they do next, and whether the traffic comes from your niche. Big audience, wrong readers, is still a miss. #SEO
Traffic is a shop window. It tells you nothing about who walks in. Before you judge a publisher, ask: who reads it, what do they do next, and does the traffic come from your niche? Big audience, wrong readers, is still a miss. #SEO
Google feeds swapped or fake results to SERP data collectors, so 5-20% of provider data is poisoned (Ahrefs). Buying a placement off a ranking screenshot? Check it in a second tool first. Fake rankings die on the second check. #SEO
Ahrefs: Google serves swapped/fake results to SERP data collectors, poisoning 5-20% of them. Before you pay for a placement sold on a ranking screenshot, cross-check it in a second tool. Borrowed screenshots fall apart there. #SEO
@semrush The commercial keyword angle is exactly why publisher vetting matters. When a site ranks for buying-intent terms, a guest post link there carries real weight, so I check the keyword mix, not just traffic totals.
@aleyda Adding this to my publisher vetting checklist. Along with traffic trends and link attributes, whether a site actually gets cited in AI answers is becoming a quality signal I check.
@semrush Agree the foundation still matters. From the link building side: one link from a real site with steady organic traffic still beats a stack of links from high DR sites that nobody actually visits.
@semrush Same thing I see when vetting guest post sites. The ones that just reword the top 10 results are the ones losing traffic, which is why I check the 12-month traffic trend before pitching anywhere.
Eggleston's study of 1,764 AI Overview citations found 51% point to pages already in the organic top 10. Lesson: AI visibility follows rankings. Get into the top 10 first. #SEO#LinkBuildingForSaaS
Study of 1,764 AI Overview citations: 51% point to pages already in the organic top 10. Rank #1 gets cited 56% of the time; rank #8 gets 9.9%. AI visibility follows rankings, not the other way around. Win the top 10 first. #SEO#LinkBuildingForSaaS
Heads up: some paid guest posts never get indexed. The vendor sends the URL, you pay, and Google never sees the page. Wait 2-4 weeks, then check with a site: search. No result means no link. #LinkBuildingForSaaS
Friendly reminder: some paid guest posts never get indexed. The vendor sends the URL, you pay, Google never sees it. Wait 2-4 weeks, check with a site: search. No result means no link. #LinkBuildingForSaaS