I think the move to simple design languages with 0 detail whatsoever just as high PPI displays were beginning to hit the market was a terrible tragedy π
The closer I look at LegacyDock on a Retina display, the more I appreciate the little details. The icons, shadows, and reflections look so crisp π§
Compatibility testing is in full swing across macOS versions on both Intel and Apple Silicon Macs. Iβll share an update tomorrow!
@SerendipitousOr@SadAlbert10 I think this is only possible in workloads where Claude is constantly waiting on long running processes (& thus not actively consuming the limit *at all* for long stretches of time)
The computer science collaboration will understand and explain a result concerning the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), a longstanding conjecture about the computational complexity of Boolean formula satisfiability, a problem deeply related to the P vs. NP problem.
Surprisingly, our system has recently proved that the ETH is false, a result that was subsequently verified in Lean.
The refutation of the ETH reopens questions about how much faster these tasks could become, and may help guide the search for better algorithms. Finding such algorithms, and turning theoretical advances into practical improvements, will require significant further research.
Our system found its natural language disproof for the ETH we reached out to to @rrwilliams. Ryan will form a collaboration with Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi to verify and shepherd this result. Impagliazzo and Paturi, along with Francis Zane, are the original proposers of the Exponential Time Hypothesis, and Williams has refuted strong versions of the ETH, used ETH for hardness results, and connected algorithms and lower bounds.
This group asked us to make all raw data of the results public to facilitate independent verification by the community, which we have done by posting the natural language proof and Lean formalization to our GitHub repo. The group also invites the community to help organize an open examination of the ETH claim and to discuss the broader questions that AI-generated breakthroughs raise about verification, access, credit, and the future of research.
https://t.co/fkLJX9a2Zi
I've been obsessed with UI design for many years
when I was a child, I actually wanted to be a UI designer someday!
I can come up with *ideas* in my imagination that I like, but I struggle to translate those into real designs in Figma & other tools
not with Claude Design! π
After switching to Claude again 'cause of Opus 5.5, I was disappointed that Claude Chats share a usage quota with Claude Code, unlike ChatGPT where Chat is separate from Codex/ChatGPT Work,
after learning how well Haiku 5.5 works for my chat use cases, I'm no longer disappointed
hmmm... I wonder if this implies Anthropic is expecting the Claude models based on their next base model to be *significantly* more capable than the 5.5 series? π€
literally every idea I come up with is being executed on already by someone else who had the same idea but with more money to spend on tokens than me π
Apparently, Anthropic is experimenting with giving Claude subscribers 20% higher 5h usage limits, but in exchange for reducing the weekly usage limits by 20%
personally, I dislike like this tradeoff π
π¨π¨ALERT: ANTHROPIC IS A/B TESTING USAGE LIMITS
Many users on X are reporting LOWER usage limits right now. THEY ARE NOT WRONG. We detected an A/B test going on that DECREASES your monthly API-value by ~20% while INCREASING your 5h usage limits by ~20%. This only affects SOME accounts. (1/2)π§΅