In British Parliament, Lords are urging the UK government to engage with Pakistani counterparts, seeking transparency and assurances on his medical care and human rights of Imran Khan. The UK Ministers are being pressed to clarify what steps are being taken diplomatically to address these concerns.
#ImranKhanUnlawfullyDetained
Today, I had the honour of speaking to the 47 countries that comprise the @UN#HumanRightsCouncil urging the immediate release of my father @imrankhanpti and all #Pakistan’s #politicalprisoners. Along with this, I want to be very clear. Like my father, I fully support maintaining GSP+ as the people of #Pakistan should never be punished for the actions of its leaders. But the Pakistani regime must also fully comply with the 27 treaties it committed to follow to obtain this benefit, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Convention Against Torture. @UN@ptiofficial #HumanRights #ImranKhanUnlawfullyDetained
”میں لا الہ الا اللہ کا ماننے والا ہوں۔ یہ کلمہ انسان کو ہر قسم کے خوف اور غلامی سے آزادی دیتا ہے- میری زندگی اللہ کے ہاتھ میں ہے عاصم منیر کے ہاتھ میں نہیں۔ ہمارا ایمان ہی ہماری ”حقیقی آزادی“ کا ضامن ہے“ عمران خان (8 ستمبر 2025)
#فوکس_صرف_عمران_خان_پر
🚨🚨#BREAKING: In an revealing 7 pages letter #SupremeCourt’s senior puisne judge #JusticeMansoorAliShah observed Chief Justice #YahyaAfridi effectively made the court a “regimented force”, Justice Shah says he wrote this letter with reluctance, but in discharge of an unavoidable institutional duty. What compels me to write is your persistent and complete indifference. Justice Shah reveals about the conduct of the CJP is like a dictator running the court that “Bench formation and cause lists are being issued unilaterally, without any Committee deliberation. Rosters are circulated for signatures, expecting members to endorse them blindly without discussion of case allocation or categorization.” Justice Shah further charge sheets his chief justice by questioning “Why are junior Judges regularly assigned to three-Member Benches while senior Judges are confined to two-Member Benches? Why are matters of national importance with far-reaching policy implications not fixed before senior Benches? The pattern suggests that independent Judges are being sidelined, not for reasons of
efficiency, but for reasons of control.”
Justice Shah alleges #SupremeCourt issues false/fake minutes of meeting “The minutes of five "Committee Meetings" displayed on the Court's website cannot cure this defect; they were not Committee meetings within the meaning of the Act but mere discussions about the Chief Justice's travel schedule. Even then, their minutes were uploaded in violation of a binding majority decision of the Committee. I had recorded my dissent on that occasion, arguing for transparency, but it was disregarded. This is symptomatic of a mindset averse to collegiality and inclined towards dictation.” Justice Shah confirms “That is why I have stopped signing the rosters circulated without any meeting. By sidelining the Committee and withholding even basic information (such as the number of cases to be dealt with or those fixed before larger Benches), you have reduced a statutory mechanism of collective decision-making into a façade.” Justice Shah blasts CJP gimmicks “The result is evident: despite the increase in the number of Judges, the Court's pendency remains at 57,455 cases. The very purpose of enhancing the Court's strength—reducing backlog—stands defeated. The unavoidable inference is that enlargement of the Court was less about addressing pendency and more about altering its internal balance, thereby diluting the independence and standing of existing Judges.” In a very concerning revelation Justice Shah told “Supreme Court Rules are a constitutional document governing the functioning of the Court. Their first revision in four decades was an event of historic significance. Such a process required a Full Court Meeting on the administrative side. Instead, you chose to approve the draft Rules by circulation— a process suited to routine matters, not to reshaping the Court's constitutional framework.
ii. By avoiding deliberation, you deprived the Court of collective wisdom and diminished judicial dialogue. This course reflects a lack of collegiality and a preference for unilateral authority.”
1/2
This family knows how to frustrate the other side with iconic reactions to adversity. They are Out of Syllabus & Takkar ke Loug for sure! Congrats everyone; looks like IK & all of us are winning, their frustration & low tactics telling the whole story.
#StayStrongAleemaKhan
WARNING — This amendment MAINTAINS US support for Asim Munir's brutal regime.
US should NOT support the military regime that is jailing pro-democracy voices like @ImranKhanPTI!
RT to tell @RepJoeWilson:
US must PAUSE $$ for @OfficialDGISPR until political prisoners are FREE!
As @TIME makes clear, this is a US-backed military regime.
The US must stop propping up this widely-despised corrupt regime and allow Pakistan to be sovereign and democratic.
"Munir’s army has the country at a choking point [but] its popularity at home is at an all-time low."
The man @ImranKhanPTI will go down in history as a symbol of strength & courage who will not compromise on his core values of Freedom, Justice and Rule of Law for Pakistan.
#freeimrankhan