@dirkuwulff@C_Laudenbach@KavithaRang Congratulations on this interesting work. Null findings are important too - and great that you publish your work at our societies @SJDM_Tweets & EADM OA journal.
@lakens@ConstantinSpath@sajedeh_rasti It was great talking to you - and great idea to coordinate - let's go for a meeting in Cologne next year. I am very much looking forward to that!
I am thrilled to announce that together with @susafiedler we got the funding to move theory specification in social psych forward as part of @meta_rep . We are offering a position in the project - please apply and spread the word. https://t.co/bJdhHBwwzO
@lakens@sajedeh_rasti Great that the issue is tackled from different groups. Let's stay in touch. That could be the next big thing. Just got funding for a project as part of @meta_rep to formally specify all classic theories of social psychology - we will use the consensus approach for a case study.
@lakens It is crucial to discuss theory of science to make our science better. Popper was important, criticisms by Kuhn, Feyerabend, Lakatos pointed out important issues too. We suggest complementing Popper by adding explicit consensus building processes https://t.co/1jcD9LldDJ
New paper published; partially funded by @meta_rep.
https://t.co/qZNdIDJE39
We compare the performance of probabilistic reasoning content models against a benchmark using a generic deep learning network model.
@BorsboomDenny@FrederikAust@GolinoHudson@giladfeldman We moved Judgment and Decision Making to cambridge in 2023 with the same publishing model and it worked out well so far. Only very few have to pay (if earmarked publishing funds are available).
@kaidi_wu@jayvanbavel As long as a universal theory claims that the theory holds everywhere and you might, based on some other theory, suspect that this is wrong, it is justified to conduct such research. Just don't "repackage" it. We see e.g. huge differences in cooperation btw nations
@jayvanbavel Platt 1964 provided the classic solution in his strong inference approach: ask yourself which theory could potentially be falsified with the study before conducting it. For doing this, theories have to be well specified, for which improvements have been developed recently.
@Noah_van_Dongen Congratulations, this is extremely important work for moving the field forward. To make this easier digestable, we can also avoid the differential equations in a first step and use a set of hempel Oppenheimer propositions and derive all conclusion that follow sensu Popper.
@a_romano90 @ScienceAdvances Congratulations to this important paper and great to see it out. We typically only think about ingroup favoritism in this domain - good to know that in competitive situations the opposite effect holds.
Today more than 10.000 people worldwide used our webpage https://t.co/tnmGEqoEVu that provides personality-specific advice to handle the current situation #COVID19 - within half a day! We are amazed by this great interest and hope that this contributes to…https://t.co/BIo4qtLEgi
@chrisdc77@RegReports We have made positive experiences in the last year with @RegReports as well #jdmresearch - particularly noticable was the great willingness of even most prominent reviewers to help with constructive comments. Great format, highly recommended.
Preliminary program of the 17th Conference of the German Social Psychology Section (Fachgruppentagung Sozialpsychologie) in Cologne is online now. Registration is still possible until Aug 31, 2019. #FGSP2019#SoCCCo
https://t.co/sfHvKhQdBG