@NaturalMVMT You might never go the root cause. Instability doesn't benefit from greater rom. It caneven aggravate. In other words, besidesthe limits of a one-fix-all approach, it might just be worse.
@NaturalMVMT It's not really about opinions. If you're expert about backpain you should know that there aren't two identical spine, and chronic pain is not 1:1 related to structural properties. However, if you prescribe this sort of movement to someone with a unstable spine ⏬
@elonmusk As an italian this is mental. I had no idea how crazy the US system was. To vote we need:
-ID (obviously lol)
-Elecoral certificate
-we have a predefinite location where to vote
-I can only vote in a certain room in a certain school, once t
I do they cross my name from their list
Hi, 10 year advertising vet here, have worked with handfuls of Fortune 100 brands. To say the ADL campaign is the cause of you losing 60% of revenue is really silly and outlandish.
Twitter does 4-5 billion in revenue a year. If the ADL made you lose $2.5 billion, that would make them one of the most powerful organizations in the history of the world.
The reason advertisers are leaving Twitter is simple. Twitter's advertising products have always been subpar compared to Meta and TikTok's offerings, both in creative types and effectiveness. The only interesting ad units you have are like-to-remind and sponsored trends. And the REAL REAL reason: in the time spent between you sending your offer to Twitter and you publicly trashing the website for being "all bots," YOU tanked the website's reputation, then got stuck making the purchase, and now have to save a reputation you created.
Every senior marketer I know laughed at the X rebrand—not because of the name itself, but because the sunday rollout with no official comms was just the latest example of why professionals don't feel like they can trust Twitter to be a professional org. They have the same concerns due to how you carry yourself on the website.
So no, the ADL did not cause a 60% revenue drop. You purchasing the site, you ripping it to shreds as you tried to back out of the deal, and your style of leadership finally gave advertisers the reason they needed to take away their budgets entirely.
Not one brand I've worked with cares what the ADL says. They DO care about brand safety, but they're not influenced by an org like that. So, they probably AGREE with the ADL, but they're mostly not advertising because of the many reasons I listed above.
@hbkazemi33@nntaleb@nntaleb is not making predictions on future AI benefits. He's (rightfully) claiming that LLM *for they way they work* cannot replace experts on specific domains.
Obviously if people realize this and use LLM for boring easy task they are super useful.
@nntaleb True. Most people don't get how it works so they're impressed by the output. Fine. But if you understand it's a very useful toy.
Not one super expert, but an entire army of morons at your service. If you understand this you can find it very convenient.
@itsPaulAi@iBobbyShell The point is that in order to make a good logo you need someone who knows your biz and the principles behind design/marketing etc. Once I made several logos with AI for my biz, frankly much better than this one, then sent to my sister who's a designer.. She laughed at me.
A new low for @elonmusk buying into the classic anti-semitic conspiracy.
Soros is a follower of Popper, one of the brightest minds of the past century. If you read Soros in Popper light many of his choices makes sense.
But you have to study first.
WTF is this real @Ledger ? this is unreal im literally getting sick
do you have any idea how much money your devices secure ???
have you been lying all this time saying the seed on the device cannot be accessed in anyway?
@nlw Rather than which one is better, to me seems more important that we have at least two prominent contender. Hopefully this will speed up innovation and gives us something way better than both in the near future.