Guilty.
They did it.
They convicted Shiloh Hendrix.
I want to say it's unbelievable, but it's not. In fact, it's increasingly routine.
It will be recorded as “disorderly conduct,” but in truth it's “Whiteness in the First Degree.”
The names and faces of the Shiloh Hendrix persecution.
Left: Michael Spindler-Krage. Rochester City Attorney who brought charges.
Middle: Nicholas Shabel. Jewish lead prosecutor.
Right: Christa Daily. Fat judge doing all she can to ensure a conviction.
Hold up, is you saying that the occupation government will do minor administrative modifications to policies that cause public frustration while refusing to carry out systematic change that would be difficult for it to roll back?
One of my favorite George Lincoln Rockwell stories:
Whenever an undercover fed was uncovered in the ANP. He'd assign them to cleaning toilets around the HQ and other petty tasks telling them that's what they had to do to become inner-circle. Letting everyone else know that guy is a fed.
He'd then after some time passing call up the FBI letting them know he really appreciates their agent for the hard work they do cleaning the place up. And can they please send 1,000+ undercover agents to him because he'd love to do a march soon and really needed the manpower.
The FBI got mad on the phone then hung up.
GLR's FBI file is the only file we've ever read where the FBI is actively seething hardcore in it about how much they hated him.
(Picture is of GLR calling MLK a nigger to his face after he claimed GLR was too much of a pussy to march through a black neighborhood and say he's a nigger directly to him)
Here are the 6 Democrats who voted YES along with 209 Republicans in the House to merge Israel’s military with the U.S.
@RepCuellar - Indicted in 2024 for bribery, Pardoned by Trump
@RepDonDavis@RepGolden not running for reelection
@RepGonzalez@RepAdamGrayCA@RepMGP
Harsh 2a reality that people can't swallow:
Inner city black males would be tossing them like snowballs if you they were readily available. You would have drive-by grenade tossings. Your average Chicago teenager would have them thrown in their backpack like a Caprisun.
REMINDER: Benjamin Netanyahu, in a letter to Rep. Stutzman last month, boldly stated that Section 219 was "his plan" to shift from aid to a permanent partnership.
"We have a great police commissioner—Jewish—she's certainly not going to arrest Netanyahu."
Radio host Mark Simone suggests New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch would never arrest Netanyahu because she's Jewish.
Prop 1 (aka the "Reproductive Freedom and Privacy Act") is a ballot measure Idaho votes on this November....
Pass it and "reproductive freedom" becomes state law, legalizing abortion (most people know that).
But there's a second Easter egg hidden in it that almost nobody is talking about.
And it ought to worry anyone who believes children deserve protection from mutilation.
Because Democrats wrote this initiative to open the door to transing kids. They buried broad "reproductive healthcare" and "privacy" language that could shield puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries from future bans.
This is a Democrat-backed Trojan horse and anyone who wants to protect children should see this initiative for exactly what it is.
In 2023 we passed the “Vulnerable Child Protection Act,” stopping Democrats from pushing puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and trans surgeries on Idaho kids. But pull up the upcoming initiative and it never names that law. Not once. But since every syllable got lawyered before it ever touched a clipboard, what's missing is missing on purpose.
Here’s how it works: if passed, the initiative grants a right to "reproductive health care that directly impact the person's own body," then lists a bunch of pregnancy/abortion-related stuff. But five little words sit in front of that list: "including but not limited to." For a lawyer, that's an open door.
So now let’s imagine a liberal judge's argument here. Hormones and surgeries? Those are “healthcare.” Impact a person's own body? About as directly as “medicine” gets. That leaves one word doing the lifting: "reproductive." And since these trans surgeries can leave a child permanently sterile, tell me what's more tied to reproduction than a treatment that ends the ability to reproduce.
Some lefty lawyer will make that argument, a woke judge will nod along, and Idaho kids will lose big.
One more phrase sits at the front: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary." Translation?
Whatever a court says this right covers beats every statute already on the books (e.g. our child protection law).
So it's whatever a black robe says it is, until a higher court reverses it, or you go back to the ballot and fight the whole thing over again. Vote no in November and the child protection law stays put. Easy. Replacing a leftist judge, though?
That could take a decade.
Think I’m paranoid? Look at Ohio. They had similar open-ended language in their 2023 amendment. Their ban on these procedures for minors got gutted by an appeals court. But the court didn't even need the new 2023 amendment because it reached back to older "health care freedom" language that was already there and did the job. And if this initiative passes here, Idaho's handing a court sharper tools than Ohio did.
A nation judged by how it guards its children. This initiative fails them at both ends because abortion and transing kids would both be back on the menu in Idaho. The people running this template state to state cash in. Kitchen tables don't write "notwithstanding any other provision of law." Lawyers on retainer do.
If this was only about abortion, the drafters could say so in one sentence (it’d cost them nothing). So ask, out loud, why that one sentence isn't in there. Because I think this was never just about abortion. It brings abortion back, yes, but it also cracks the door for a judge to sterilize and transition kids behind their parents' backs.
And a decent person says no to both, loudly, in November.
Former Congressman Dennis Kucinich warns that Section 219 of the NDAA is a complete, well-planned takeover of the United States military by Benjamin Netanyahu.
He says the bill will give Netanyahu the ability to direct the U.S. military.
"But the truth is that it is laying the groundwork for an entanglement that has never happened in the history of the United States."
"This is totally unprecedented."
The UK is covered in a network of CCTV cameras, the average citizen might be filmed upwards of 70 times a day
Those cameras weren't used to stop the rape gangs, but they were used to track down citizens who protested the rape gangs
Why would Flock cameras be different?
Everything Germany said was going to happen, happened. Look at the state of England and Europe now. The Balkans was destroyed under sovietism. I really wish people had listened.
AT WHAT POINT DO WE HAVE A DUTY TO OVERTHROW OUR GOVERNMENT?
It's not my idea, its in the Declaration of Independence.
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [securing unalienable rights], it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it... But when a long train of abuses... evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government..."