(1) Ich verachte alles und jeden ab #Konservativ. Nicht, weil ihr anders denkt β sondern weil ihr nicht denken wollt. Weil ihr euere Angst als β#Werteβ verkauft und euere Arroganz als β#Traditionβ.
Weil ihr glaubt, das Alte verdiene Ehrfurcht nur, weil es alt ist.
@alexwg ST isnβt "intelligence poor". Its intelligence is ambient. Ships translates, diagnoses, simulates, navigates, and can accidentally create Moriarty.
Star Wars mass-produces droid labor/slaves. Trek asks the harder questions.
@alexwg@ncalcamper Star Wars:
"We have intelligent droids. They work for us." -> Slaves.
Star Trek:
"Wait a minute. If this being is intelligent and self-aware, do we even have the moral right to use it as a tool?"
@bundeskanzler Ein ungelΓΆstes Problem bleibt, dass du als unbeliebtester Kanzler aller Zeiten deinen eigenen Worten keine Taten folgen lΓ€sst und nicht zu dem stehst, was du versprochen hast, Fritz.
@METALEagle15@Skeletonkey5555 3) BUT!!!!
None of it identifies the cloth as first-century, let alone as Jesus's burial shroud. And the direct radiocarbon measurement dated the linen to 1260β1390 CE.
@METALEagle15@Skeletonkey5555 2) are conference proceedings, methodology papers, reviews, and even a general-interest magazine article. The research supports some genuinely interesting findings like probable blood, unusual image chemistry and an unresolved exact formation mechanism.
@METALEagle15@Skeletonkey5555 When someone asks "Which science?", normal adults understand it's a request to name your sources, not an invitation for a semantics debate. π Imagine writing three replies avoiding the question just because you lack a single peer-reviewed link.
Will you deliver anything now?
@METALEagle15@Skeletonkey5555 Cute deflection pal! Asking for a peer reviewed source isn't bot behavior, it's called basic critical thinking.
If the science is so overwhelmingly on your side, dropping a link should take you 5 seconds instead of writing paragraphs to avoid it.
Still waiting! π