Why is Sunny Hostin lying about being the hold out juror?
According to this article, Asunción "Sunny" Cummings Hostin is actually upset with the holdout juror, saying she believed the cannibal defendant was aware of his actions. She was upset w/the juror pushing for a NGBROI verdict.
Is she really this desperate? It’s easily checked!
Did you know that until July 1990, McDonald’s fried its French fries in a blend that was mostly beef tallow?
That changed after Omaha businessman Phil Sokolof spent millions of his own money on full-page newspaper ads accusing McDonald’s and other fast-food chains of “poisoning America” with high-fat food.
Amid the backlash, McDonald’s switched to frying its fries in vegetable oil instead.
Burger King, Wendy’s, and other chains quickly followed.
You may think this isn’t a big deal. But look at obesity in the 1970s and 1980s, then how it took off in the 1990s. What if vegetable oils were one of the culprits?
You’ll never guess Phil Sokolof’s ethnic background—the man who pushed vegetable oils into your fast food.
Now you know.
The Loxist Protocol
At first, the (Jewish) media dismissed it and mocked it as a conspiracy theory, just like the Karleghi-Bilderberg-Loxist Agenda and every single psychological operation.
Now that they have seized 100 per cent of the power in the white goyim countries, they have abandoned their hidden ‘victim’ mode and are now engaged in an aggressive campaign of ethnic cleansing against all white goyim cattle.
https://t.co/NsO30kaCOu
Living in a "disadvantaged" neighborhood doesn't turn anyone into a violent criminal.
A 2021 study investigated this effect:
There are more criminals in disadvantaged neighborhoods (red line), but this is due to a selection phenomenon, since when the same person (blue line) changes neighborhood and ends up in a more disadvantaged neighborhood (or vice versa) during his or her lifetime, the probability that he or she will commit a violent crime hardly changes.
We can therefore say that there is a correlation, but not causation. Poverty does not explain criminal behavior.
@ChitownMike312@SethyPoker@IfindRetards The people who voted are wrong.
If you play your friend for 100 and lose, "double or nothing" means that you double the original bet so that you can not only win your money back but have the chance of winning the original bet. How people don't understand this is bewildering.
@SethyPoker@SpiciestPenny I meant 300.
But where do you think the "or nothing" comes from?
You are doubling the bet to get your money back if you win, or nothing.
It's so stupid to think what you think. "Let's do it again." Is not "double or nothing"
This is so dumb.
@SethyPoker@SpiciestPenny Wrong. The answer is 400.
Double or nothing is doubling the previous win. It's saying "put all of your winnings on the table so I can get ahead"
It's not just betting the same amount again, it's the loser asking for you to play the dice in his favor.