Bartamaeus

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@realBigBrainAI FFS. He needs to read a book.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@washghost1 We have a septic system. If the TP has poop on it, it gets flushed. No poop = trash can (lid on it with a foot pedal lid opener)

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@boringguy02 @Aristotle7777 I get your point but he literally says the word studies in the 3rd paragraph/section of his post

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@IfindRetards AIDS?

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@BasedBiohacker Legit Rx from a "sleep" doctor. (Some flavor of pulmonologist who specializes in sleep apnea.) Rx bc of 'excessive daytime sleepiness.'

Achieving flow state and locked into the zone is effortless.

I get to work, look up what seems like 5 minutes later and the day is done.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@kaitlancollins Nobody reading all that

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@MopTheTerritory @samim Or possibly describing the physics engine of a massively complex simulation (thought experiment, not a claim)

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@TexitLiberty5 @rArmyReddit Using a 60 year old stock marketing photo does not support the point you're trying to make.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@Outdoctrination @Isaiah56and1 That's exactly the point. It's the whole hook for a naked attempt for engagement with the post.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@JeffBohren Does persistent prompting from thousands of concurrent user sessions represent enough continuity for a steady state stream of 'consciousness'?

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@realJohnJohnJr Just happened? The House has been on recess for over 10 days, not expected to reconvene until November 3rd.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@exsurfer @Tim_Denning I also keyed in on that exact line. I don't so much disagree with the statement as I think it was far too over simplified.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@BasedBiohacker Humbly submitted for this thread's consideration:

Sunosi is superior to both.

(At least for my genetically predisposed metabolic furnace.)

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@BasedBiohacker Sunosi. Same effect without the hard edge of Monafinil. And you can actually fall asleep that night.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

The actual question asked in (one of) the papers asked: do models use internal confidence signals to decide whether to answer or abstain?

It's a HUGE, grossly hyperbolic claim to interpret that as being the same thing as human metacognition.

The study/paper never says “sense of self,” “self-awareness,” “consciousness,” or “look inward” in the human sense.

It was a metacognitive labelled computational control.

This account certainly seems to be trying to steer a narrative. I see you.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

I acknowledge defense of the hard work. Defending the work shouldn't be an end in itself.

A rail that does not output Sigma, Qa, or T 1/2 cannot tell Dubna why the beam is quiet. Put those numbers on the table and the test is real. Until then, the bicone is a map of a city the experiment is not in.

If you are index-theoretic, stop challenging the lab that measures rates; if you are challenging that lab, the rates need to also be on the same table. Page 25’s TeV resonance does not resolve the mismatch.

If IT3 predicts allowed rails only AND there's no claim about production. That would be the same city.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@dr_logvinovich Index-theorectic framework or not, your reply reinforces IT3's avoidance of standard falsifiable nuclear physics metrics.

The point being that not addressing standard nuclear Hamiltonian metrics is a gap that cannot be dismissed, regardless of the framework being theoretic.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

Smarter people than me have said before that you can invent a story for any integer in base 2.

You admit you don't compute nuclear Hamiltonian, Qα, or cross-sections. In other (cheap) words, you omitted the quantities that decide whether 119/120 can even be made.

Your bicone is pretty - and the beam doesn't care.

[Bartamaeus @Bartholomewster]

@HowToPrompt__ A con works by making you feel clever, not cheated.

Okay, that fits for lazy, passive users.

It does not fit for users who keep a mental ledger of who said what.

That not lazy user is aware of the tool's usage pitfalls.