Amazing level of BS is behind the estimate of 250,000 white girls victimized by "Muslim rape gangs."
What they did was:
1) Come up with a number for Telford, Oxford, and Rotherham, the center of the scandal
2) Extrapolate to the rest of the country
Imagine if, to calculate murders in America, you looked at Detroit, Chicago, and Baltimore and then assumed all of America has the same murder rate.
But wait, there's more!
Even the original numbers are nonsense.
To get the original estimate for Oxford, they included all supposed victims of sexual exploitation or grooming, by Muslims or anyone else. This means that they assumed 100% of victims were white girls and 100% of the perpetrators were Muslims for all cases of sexual exploitation!
The report also switches between saying there were 250,000 victims, and 250,000 instances of victimization, without any explanation why.
For Telford, they went back 40 years, though I don't think that there were Muslim rape gangs in the 1980s. The Oxford number includes all instances of "grooming," whether or not they involved sexual contact at all, and not much is shared about the methodology. It is a complete guess.
I often hear rightists say "the liberals lie so I don't believe anything." What conclusion are we supposed to draw from the fact that rightists are this indifferent to facts?
@patmccormick@jurgen_nauditt That's like saying that China must accept American imperialism and bullying because if it wasn't for Americans they would be speaking Japanese now.
Is irrelevant what you did before if now you are behaving like a shit head
@ForemanG0AT@OSUDOC63@JamieBonkiewicz There is technically nothing morally wrong with it, just like there is nothing wrong to invite LGBT people to the white house