This is also a good sign that there is little point in the current attempts to push again for Norway to join
Although for Norway it makes more sense than for Iceland as it has physical connections to the EU
This is absolutely the right call for Iceland
With no physical interconnection with the EU it makes little sense to be a member and rather have a mutually beneficial relationship with the EU
🚨🇮🇸 BREAKING: Iceland has rejected a government proposal to restart negotiations on EU membership
"Should negotiations on Iceland's membership in the European Union start again?"
❌ NO - 52.5%
✅ YES - 47.5%
I have nothing against him as a person, he seemed like a nice enough guy, but I think the praise seems a bit excessive. He was a modern man, which was good, but that should also really be expected.
He was not the only European monarch to marry a commoner etc.
That the king died during the lunar eclipse is kind of a cool coincidence.
Sadly, this would have been a nice time to draw the line for the Norwegian monarchy, but alas. I hope one day the monarchy will end the way it started, with a supermajority referendum.
@TTofthanse35452@joakial_@maxellu What do you mean?
The government does not have a profit incentive like a private operator, thus unlike them will provide gambling to those who want without it being promoted/encouraged, and all profits go to the public
@AlecStapp@0xmaritime Not about inequality, comparing groups
When you have more money than you can spend in a lifetime, consumption (at least in this normal sense) doesn't really matter to them
The world getting richer is good for well-being, sure, though this is about inequality
A reminder that the wealth tax under Støre is a return to normal after right-wing slashing, not a sudden and unexpected rise.
If you dislike "uncertainty" and want "stability", the responsible ones are the right-wing who slashed it, not those returning to normal.
@TTofthanse35452@joakial_@maxellu Yes, but only if provided by the government and some exceptions for limited cases if for charities, voluntary associations etc.
"...minst 64 personer på Kapitals liste over landets 400 rikeste en utenlandsk adresse... utflyttede arvinger med eierandeler i familiebedrifter... 101."
"...In the past two years ... 100 of Norway's top 400 taxpayers...have fled the country"
These are NOT the same claim
@hagaetc ANY tax is an implicit form of confiscation
All "problems" mentioned can be easily fixed by just allowing payment in kind for the portion applied to shares/similar
Although I don't think many like you will care, the real issue is that you and rich people don't want to pay tax
Anyone with basic knowledge of the list will see that due to the list being very top-heavy and the top 3 (20%) and others just in the top 20 (42%) have lived abroad for long this will give a warped picture.
The point about the 400 is deceptive
With those that might count with the recent increase the maximum is 9-13% (or even 7-13%), just correcting for the top 20, so likely actual number quite lower
Also natural to consider that a lot is likely tangential to the wealth tax itself
Friendly reminder to California: Taxes on unrealized capital gains have led to more than half of the wealth held by Norway’s top 400 taxpayers moving abroad.
I.e. Norway has become more equal and made everybody poorer and worse off, just as expected from strong socialist ideas.
- Not all have made their money in Norway/lived there for a long time (min 3.6%)
- The use of control/country here is fuzzy (min 2.2%)
- Shippowners are a disproportionate part of Norways wealthiest and are historically NOTORIOUS tax dodgers no matter country of origin (ca. 20%)
Sylvi's result is spectacular. She has managed to make FrP (23.9%) larger than Høyre, KrF, and Venstre combined (23.6%) [FrP>>H, KrF, V]. It's a result that, even if the left ends up winning, could represent a total shift in Norwegian politics in the long term.
#norwayelection