There seems to be a lot of confusion on the SWFC zero point ruling when comparing to the zero points Derby also received.
Both Clubs paid/are paying 25p in the Β£ to unsecured creditors.
Derbyβs owner completely wrote his debt off. The Wednesday owner was made a sizeable offer.
Derby paid 25p in the Β£ and left the tax man owed Β£10βs of millions (EFL Insolvency Policy directs 100p - discretion shown). Wednesday are paying off all owed (100p in the Β£) to HMRC.
Iβm struggling to square why some feel Wednesday should get more than Derby got for exiting Administration when the shortfall to creditors is so much less in the case of SWFC?
Furthermore, the shortfall against EFL Insolvency Policy is also much less in the case of SWFC.
@GrantR_1867@Mr_Gillanders This is all relative though isn't it. We javent paid any fees prior to Macron deal hence the higher prices now. Another example of DC cutting corners.
@swfc There is a fine line between giving him fighting experience and completely demoralising the player. Can't fault him or anyone else who has had enough of the current situation at Hillsborough. It's depressing.
Giveaway - #swfc player shirts poster
To be in with a chance of winning an A3 size print;
RT this tweet
Follow me
Winner announced 02 Nov
Is your favourite Owl on here?
Which SWFC cult heroes did I miss out?
#wawaw