🚨BREAKING: A U.S. citizen was riding his bike in Laredo, Texas… when Border Patrol agents pulled alongside him and illegally tried to block him in.
When he kept riding, they chased him down, physically grabbed him by the arm, and immediately started demanding identification and asking where he was from.
He told them he born in Laredo, Texas.
But that was not good enough.
The agent asked, “What high school did you go to?”
He answered that, too… and they still kept demanding ID, over and over again.
The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. In America, law enforcement don’t get to randomly stop people, physically grab them, and demand identification because they feel like it.
Being on a bike isn’t a crime.
You also don’t have to carry an ID on you unless you are operating a motor vehicle… which he was not.
So, demanding an ID, without probable cause, is illegal.
And the cherry on top? When the man went to use his phone, an agent tried to stop him by grabbing it… apparently unaware the entire encounter was already being recorded by his glasses.
If Border Patrol can stop an American born citizen riding his bike, demand his papers, and put their hands on him without stating a lawful reason… every American should be paying attention.
“NBC’s Matt Gorman” is an outrageous way to describe this man to NBC viewers when he has most recently been a registered foreign agent for the state of Israel.
That NBC doesn’t disclose that, and that they allow him on air to attack Platner, is exactly why normal people support Platner and want him to take a wrecking ball to this corruption.
Gorman’s contract with the Israeli ministry of foreign affairs appears to have recently terminated, so perhaps this is a try out for a new one.
To let him on air and not disclose this is shameful.
Why Zionism has became a litmus test & why it inhibits the critical thinking skills of people who embrace it:
1. You have to believe an alleged two-thousand-year right-of-return is infinitely more just & righteous than a two-generation right-of-return.
2. You have to believe that while all belligerent military occupations in human history produce armed resistance, Palestinian Arab armed resistance is actually not drive by occupation, but by an innate hostility of the occupied people towards the religion of the people occupying them.
3. You have to believe in equality before the law in the country you live in but inequality before the law in Israel, since Jews need more rights & privileges than non-Jews in Israel, otherwise it wouldn't be a Jewish State.
4. You have to believe the universe is governed by gravity, mitochondrial DNA & antisemitism.
5. You have to believe that trying to establish a Jewish State with a Jewish supermajority working at Jewish-only cooperatives living in Jewish-only colonies owned by Jewish-only land authorities operating Jewish-only schools maintained by Jewish-only militias in a country that was overwhelmingly Palestinian Arab and a region that overwhelming Arab was a good idea.
Look it's very simple. If you want to wear a small hat and sing Hava Nagila, that's awesome. If you want to support a genocidal apartheid state, you're a piece of shit.
People always try to add in extra layers of complexity, but that's really all there is to it.
@jack226RE@DisgracedProp …example Karen Read was, it will be after my life is turned upside down and my retirement savings drained. And then the prosecutor will shrug and say “oops, sorry!”
Fuck you
@jack226RE@DisgracedProp …under suspicion, and one of these out of control, unethical prosecutors looking to put another conviction on their record at any cost will come gunning for me, and try to convince a gullible jury that lack of actual proof isn’t a problem! If I end up acquitted, like for…
@RyanSitra@ColtranesHorn@DisgracedProp I ‘m sure you could win. Just as 900 prosecutors convicted 900 sub-postmasters of crimes that were never committed in 900 separate trials. The need to prove guilt is a fiction.
@ColtranesHorn@DisgracedProp The lack of a crime never stops a prosecutor from seeking a conviction. 900 sub-postmasters were convicted of fraud and embezzlement on the basis of false narratives fed to jurors by prosecutors in 900 separate cases. Years later, it was proven no crime occurred.
@DisgracedProp Being able to routinely obtain convictions without actual proof is EXACTLY why false convictions are endemic in the US “justice” system. Prosecutors who think the fact that they get away with it is evidence it’s acceptable are a big part of the problem.