@TheCinesthetic "Why love, if losing hurts so much? I have no answers anymore: only the life I have lived. Twice in that life I've been given the choice: as a boy and as a man. The boy chose safety, the man chooses suffering. The pain now is part of the happiness then. That's the deal."
@MuseZack The parts of the movie where the occult is played straight and taken seriously, like Egon discussing Ivo Shandor's cult ("After the first world war he thought society was too sick to survive") or Winston and Ray quoting the Book of Revelations are effectively creepy.
@CWingUexkull Well everyone knows that Verhoeven meant his movie as a critique or satire of fascism. That's pretty obvious aesthetically, and that's the filmmaker's intended subtext.
But what's happening right there on the surface? What's the story *above* the subtext?
@CathodeCoaster@SemperAtomos They absolutely cannot, true, and the BDSM feel is blatantly obvious. At the same time, the text of the story focuses on heterosexual characters, and the Hellish consequences of their affair.
@TheCinesthetic When you love someone, you've gotta trust them. There's no other way. You've got to give them the key to everything that's yours. Otherwise, what's the point? And for a while, I believed, that's the kind of love I had.
@s_decatur Mr. Jealousy is also a banger. Before his term as grounded Wes Anderson and millennial Woody Allen, Noah Baumbach had a Whit Stillman phase, and recruited Eigeman for one of the 90s most underrated rom coms.
@TheCinesthetic Far and away, one of the coolest things a director has ever done, and somehow impossibly kept it under wraps. Practically jumped out of my seat.