@queseraseraAsli@propfirmsupdate@fortraderscom They are top 3 on propfirmatch and they sell 100k accounts man, those are conservative numbers. The firm doesn’t say anything if you fail the account but when you start making payouts they banned you 🤣
I got SCAMMED by @fortraderscom after collecting $5,300 across two payouts. My funded account was active for 1 month. I DIDN'T BREACH MY ACCOUNT, they manually terminated it citing an "AI account alert" from their AI system, zero specifics given.
I asked for reconsideration and what exactly was flagged. Their own written response: "It is not a finding of rule breaking, there is no allegation of misconduct against you." THEIR OWN WORDS. No rule broken. Still "final and irrevocable."
My KYC was clean, my verification interview was approved same day, and I followed every rule published in their FAQ. This wasn't one oversized bet, it was two clean payouts on an actively traded account. Receipts below.
@PropFirmMatch@MartinPFM@JohnPFM@PFMSupport please look into For Traders and their termination practices, case #128186423 is already open with your Compliance team.
@PropFirmMedia@propfirmeye@PropFirmsGuru@propfirmknow@propfundsquad@propworldnews@propfirmnation1@theproptruth@Propfirmedge
If firms need to protect their risk, fine, that's the business. But banning a trader who followed every rule, right after he starts collecting, with an alert they refuse to explain, isn't risk management. It's a trapdoor. Firms should do better.
NOT FAIR GUYS, first i thought in giving up and moving on but this is not fair it should be fairness in the propfirm space doesnt matter if they have strict rules meanwhile they are CLEAR rules and not just BANNING traders because they start collecting money
@avikkfp@hammadtrades@fundingpips Literally you can take any trade from anyone and match it with someone trading the opposite because they’re not even in the same time open and close
@avikkfp@hammadtrades@fundingpips So sad to see what FP is doing and the attitude this guy is taking. That’s not enough evidence to accuse a trader for reverse edging, first I thought both accounts were his . But when I realized they are different owners when you have thousands of traders is ridiculous 🤣
@21stdv@BlueGuardiancom@seanbaint Bro you didn’t get scammed, you did not respect the 80% margin rule. And you still have your account active so I don’t understand why are you complaining.
Not to hate but I think thats not a scam
@ashiiikkkk17 Not at all, tha's why you place all the rules and the forbidden practices on your FAQ. Objective rules gives the company a legitimate business, i didn't cheat i have many payouts with different propfirms and have never been acused of cheating
Risk management matters, and firms have every right to protect their capital. But that's exactly why rules need to be as objective as possible, that's what creates a fair environment for both traders and the firm. A black-box alert with no defined criteria isn't risk management, it's a trapdoor. I know For Traders acted within their contract here, that's what makes it so disappointing.
Risk management matters, and firms have every right to protect their capital. But that's exactly why rules need to be as objective as possible that's what creates a fair environment for both traders and the firm. A subjective, unexplained black-box alert isn't risk management, it's a trapdoor. I know For Traders acted within their contract here that's precisely what makes this so disappointing.
@SaadShahzad20@fundingpips Cause that’s 2 different things first one is a trading idea so I imagine you can split your entries but not stacked em at the same time. So you can re enter if you setup is still valid.
But I think is going to be confusing for a lot of people and some will get a strike
@ReaganDisu@Flynnn_FN Puedes iniciar sesión en las cuentas que quieras mientras sean tuyas, o sea estén a tu nombre. Está persona inicio sesión en su celular con cuentas que no están a su nombre