@jpbricsdxb@Currentreport1 That was when Iran let you use the strait for free, now you have to pay to go through there. So yeah times have changed and according to Iranian law that commerce is illegal.
@TwitoDor27771@mqudsi No rapes, or even sexual harassment has EVER been committed by a Hamas militant in the history of it's existence. This is a flat out lie.
@geogristle They didn't develop for arduino, they weren't one of the faceless nameless engineers who put out code guides and code examples for the masses to see. OpenAI essentially scraped all of this hard work into a compression algorithm that spits it back in a neat format. fuck openai.
@TankerTrackers You pick a narrative, you pretend to be this neutral data provider but are clearly pro US/Zio. Tell me is the flow back to 80% or are they hitting every ship? bc if the flow is no good they're hitting them, if the flow is good it's because they're paying Iran
@sentdefender This is a lie, the war is not about the nuclear file but about Israhel's hegemony over the middle east. No discussions about the nuclear file are taking place as the U.S is loosing the war. Discussions (if there's any) are about releasing Iran's stolen assets and war reparations.
@BrainwashdBigot@pinlar75@HormuzLetter Well apparently Iran thinks a strategic placement for their missiles is aircraft carriers. You retard, if you had any reading comprehension you'd realize I meant you can't park an aircraft carrier next to Iran to attack it and say hey don't attack it back or we'll nuke you.
@NoLimitGains That's unrealized private gains from the AI bubble. No demand for that stock so he wouldn't be able to sell it, making them essentially worthless.
@ByrneHobart@edzitron What's your point here? Are you one of those retards who thinks "AI Investments" are going somewhere. It's the biggest financial bubble in history.
@nerfzael@Mr_Salio It doesn't need to. Recent models are so good they're indistinguishable for real work. Only difference is in "benchmarks" or unrealistic "one-shot a video" prompts which no one does in a real work flow. The work is incremental and either one of these with opencode is enough
@MidwitSophistry@jun_song The uncensored versions are uncensored on everything. Well almost except CSAM, which is an attestation to the integrity of the open weights community.
@alexisgallagher@lu_sichu Everyone reframes the AI debate as scientistists being afraid of Intelligent machines that's going to replace them, when it's just espionage, data theft and IP violations we're talking about here.
@MrSnowwx@Hesamation AI is incapable of abstract critical thought as of now, everything you think you know about AI is a carefully crafted narrative to justify insane valuations inflating a financial bubble. The stokes-navier result was stolen from an elite human scientist working on the problem.
go fuck yourself @sama
claiming that you solved navier stokes because 10000 agents ran in circles for 88hours on a multimillion dollar gpu cluster to formalize in lean a blowup case under controlled external forcing is pure scientific vulgarity the clay mathematics institute millennium prize does not ask m whether you can artificially force a singularity in a fluid by injecting an ad hoc smooth external forcing term f(x,t) to twist the vortex until it breaks the real problem questions the fundamental stability and global smooth existence for 3dimensional incompressible euler & navier stokes equations under natural conservation laws and viscous dissipation alone using a mathematical loophole on forced equations to parade a century old victory is a major conceptual scam Altman
technically & epistemologically what you present as an agi breakthrough is nothing more than bruteforce combinatorial autoformalization the ai did not understand fluid mechanics it simply navigated a continuous search space previously mapped out and constrained by the monumental work of human mathematicians like tristan buckmaster/ levent alpöge / diego córdoba or tarek elgindi coordinating 10000 agents to check the logical consistency of a 100 page proof via lean is a software engineering feat and computational parallelization triumph not an intrinsic scientific discovery it is the victory of the compute bulldozer over abstract human intuition repackaged for the public as a higher mathematical consciousness
to this theoretical imposture you add a disgusting ethical and industrial cynicism taking advantage of private codex sessions and informal preprints from academic researchers to siphon their research leads and then trying to redact or erase the contribution of levent alpöge under the pretext that he works at rival anthropic is intellectual serfdom openai behaves like a feudal lord of silicon appropriating the cognitive subsistence of independent scholars threatening their careers behind closed doors if they protest and turning community academic labor into a privatized pressrelease
this entire staged event serves a desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models openai needs to manufacture an artificial sputnik moment claiming to solve a millennium prize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional peer review means using the prestige of fundamental mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a delusional valuation!!!
real science is not a clout chase on social media or a compute spike spent to rob the clay mathematics institute it is a quest for elegance physical truth and universal rigor to decode reality true artificial intelligence will not emerge from hostile corporate takeover of academic work hidden behind computational bruteforce but from architectures capable of generating new conceptual paradigms by masquerading constrained formalization as the collapse of physics greatest mysteries you did not solve navier stokes you only proved how far silicon valley will go to prostitute scientific integrity for capitalist spectacle