The government's equity portfolio of 36 companies has a distressingly weak legal foundation, says Cato’s @scottlincicome.
None of the cited laws expressly authorize federal ownership stakes in private companies. #CatoRFE
https://t.co/qWz68qGyVk
Very interesting.
Many countries have a functional mortgage system and high homeownership without their own Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
So what social function is being done here?
What has $7.8 trillion in federally backed mortgages actually accomplished?
• US homeownership sits at ~65% – virtually what it was in the late 1960s.
• Home price and construction volatility remain among the highest in the developed world.
Federal intervention has boosted home mortgage debt, not homeownership.
Full report: https://t.co/lRtbswwTBc
Supporters of South Korea’s industrial policy point to the firms that thrived.
@APanagariya points to everyone else: unfavored firms, consumers, and the economy as a whole.
What that means for Washington's equity stakes:
https://t.co/aGsVjovH0W #CatoRFE
South Korea’s heavy-industry push, Sweden’s state ownership, America’s “friendfunding” with allies, and more coming soon.
New #CatoRFE international essays offer lessons from abroad to warn Washington about its current ownership spree:
https://t.co/QYNxKFluIf
Amtrak was supposed to become self-sufficient within a few years. Fifty-six years later, it has never earned a profit, and it lost $1.9 billion on operations in 2025.
@CatoEdwards on what government ownership did to passenger rail: https://t.co/xLqgNwzXdx #CatoRFE
Before U.S. Steel and Intel, there was Amtrak. And Fannie and Freddie. And TARP.
Cato’s new case studies show what happens when Washington owns businesses, and why it’s so hard to get out: https://t.co/kmvSQCCZK6 #CatoRFE
@reason on #CatoRFE
"When the government gets involved in any industry, it complicates matters for the companies in which shares are held, for competitors who must worry that regulators will put their thumbs on the scale to help favored firms, and for the market in general."
October 2026: The CHIPS Act, along with other legal authorities pointed to by the administration, does not explicitly authorize the government to take ownership stakes in private US firms.
https://t.co/AZ1YYIGqz1
Since 2022, @scottlincicome has argued that CHIPS Act subsidies would come with political strings and risky bets.
As of October 2026, the government has taken ownership stakes in 22 firms using CHIPS subsidies for authorization.
A quick review of Scott's work on CHIPS🧵 #CatoRFE
McKinley:
Falsely declaring TARP a success emboldens current and future administrations to cite past intervention as precedent for similar government investment programs.
TARP was sold to Congress as a plan to buy troubled mortgage assets. Treasury quickly turned it into a program to buy stakes in banks.
@VernMcKinley on why that’s no model for today’s equity deals:
https://t.co/VXDc62bObz #CatoRFE
McKinley:
[Secretary Henry] Paulson later described the instinct behind that moment with unusual candor: "Even if you don’t have the authorities—and frankly I didn’t have the authorities for anything—if you take charge, people will follow. Someone has to pull it all together."
The Cato Institute has launched Restoring Free Enterprise, a new project examining the federal government’s growing ownership and control of private companies and how to reverse it. Follow @Cato_RFE for timely commentary and research. #CatoRFE
https://t.co/043qfq6x5g
The administration has cited several laws to justify the government’s new shareholding arrangements, yet not one of them expressly authorizes the executive branch to take an ownership stake in a private US company.
@scottlincicome in @thedispatch: https://t.co/KTEF3k9zhH #CatoRFE