𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝘄𝗶𝗻 — 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿.
No setup. Secure. Infinitely scalable.
We just raised a $𝟭𝟬𝗠 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗱.
After a beta with 𝟭𝟬𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬+ 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗱, we’re now opening to everyone.
RT and comment “Twin” — first agents on us. 👇
@systematicls We all see it in our peripherals but to explicitly acknowledge it is another thing. I can speak from experience waging on high variance bets, but I now bet on my specific skills and increased luck by attempting to create more than I consume.
I expected more from @emirates. You can’t even submit this form on their site because of the required “Select flight” field that has no flight options.
We're heading for cognitive hyper abundance y'all. What does that mean? It means that human intelligence will no longer be a constraint on any scientific or economic activity.
What are the first order effects of this?
o1 explains it better than I could:
The emergence of a world where human intelligence is no longer a constraint on economic, social, and scientific endeavors would rapidly transform production and innovation. Cognitive hyper abundance would erase many traditional bottlenecks in R&D, enabling near-instantaneous breakthroughs in scientific fields ranging from biotechnology to clean energy. Markets would recalibrate as the marginal cost of knowledge-based products and services approached zero, dissolving old competitive barriers and creating wealth at an unprecedented rate. Economic sectors that once relied on specialized expertise would expand or shift toward tasks requiring creativity and empathy, while newly automated cognitive tasks would release immense human capacity to experiment with novel forms of entrepreneurship, research, and personal development.
Socially, the dissolution of intellectual barriers would trigger mass realignments in education, cultural expression, and governance. Education could become a process of creative exploration rather than rote instruction, with learners guided by systems capable of personalizing lessons and instantly correcting misunderstandings. The resulting democratization of advanced skills might neutralize inequality in knowledge access, though new challenges would arise around how societies regulate such transformative power. Old forms of prestige built upon scarcity of expertise could recede, and new forms of social distinction might develop around originality, emotional intelligence, and moral leadership.
In addition, political structures would likely adapt to manage the turbocharged pace of discovery. Governments might struggle to keep up with rapidly evolving norms and industries, forcing them to reimagine regulatory frameworks and possibly even the meaning of representative decision-making. The potential to solve existential challenges, including resource scarcity and environmental degradation, would be magnified by the proliferation of supercharged problem-solving tools. However, there could also be acute risks if the disparity in access and control of cognitive abundance were to concentrate power in the hands of a small elite or specialized organizations. These first-order consequences illustrate how solving ASI, defined here as removing the constraint of human intelligence, would catalyze profound shifts in virtually every dimension of human life.
“NASA has this phrase that they like: ‘Failure is not an option.’ But failure has to be an option in art and in exploration, because it’s a leap of faith. And no important endeavor that required innovation was done without risk. You have to be willing to take those risks. So, that’s the thought I would leave you with, is that in whatever you’re doing, failure is an option, but fear is not.”
-James Cameron
Keep chasing the stars @SpaceX@elonmusk