Yes. It is necessary. There is demonic evil and criminality squatting in the White House and it needs to be removed immediately. The world came close to seeing nukes being used the other week. Trump needs to be thrown out together with the cabinet. Immediately. For the sake of the planet 🌍
@chiky_handlr@RepRaskin
Massive destruction to this GOV has been done by this PROFOUNDLY UNFIT CORRUPT LYING EVIL called Trump. So much, parts need ABOLISHED, Reformed w ETHICS, insuring candidates are well vetted BEFORE approved to run for office, like any high power position should be‼️
A massive social media movement is demanding the removal of Donald Trump and his entire cabinet.The web is on fire in 2026: is it time for a total reset at the white house?
Do you support the removal of all members of the trump administration?
Iran’s actual official line (from the Foreign Ministry spokesperson and state agencies) has been that it finds the U.S. cease‑fire demands to be excessive or unreasonable and that no direct negotiations have taken place recently, particularly criticising public claims by U.S. officials about active talks.
@SkyNews If a country's foreign minister has to publicly correct the narrative, it just shows how weaponized media has become in modern geopolitical conflict. Media should report facts, not spin propaganda for one side.
**🧵 X thread – April 4, 2026**
**Tweet 1**
🇮🇷📰 Iran’s foreign minister has taken to social media to say the country’s position is being “misrepresented by U.S. media,” after the Wall Street Journal reported that officials were unwilling to meet U.S. counterparts in Pakistan.
The analyst examines the conflicting claims and the incentives behind them.
**Tweet 2**
What the WSJ reported (April 3):
✅ Fact: Citing mediators, the WSJ stated that Iran had officially informed them it is unwilling to meet U.S. officials in Islamabad in the coming days and considers Washington’s demands unacceptable[reference:0][reference:1].
The report suggested that Pakistan-led mediation efforts had reached a dead end.
**Tweet 3**
Iran’s response:
✅ Fact: Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on social media that Tehran’s position is being “misrepresented by U.S. media.” An Iranian official later told Dawn that reports of a refusal to meet in Islamabad were denied, stating: “Iran’s immediate focus is on the war and not negotiations”[reference:2].
The official also cited “deep mistrust” of U.S. intentions.
**Tweet 4**
Pakistan’s denial:
✅ Fact: On April 4, Pakistan’s Foreign Office rejected the WSJ reports as “baseless” and a “figment of imagination,” saying a background briefing had been “misrepresented”[reference:3][reference:4].
Spokesperson Tahir Andrabi urged media to rely on official statements only.
**Tweet 5**
The ground truth, according to multiple sources:
✅ Fact: A senior Pakistani official told Dawn that messages had been relayed between Washington and Tehran, but the absence of a clear Iranian signal has slowed momentum. “It is surprising that despite the obliteration of significant military infrastructure, Iran has not responded positively to calls for negotiations”[reference:5].
✅ Fact: Pakistani leaders remain in contact with President Pezeshkian and FM Araghchi, but Tehran has not yet conveyed readiness for dialogue[reference:6].
**Tweet 6**
Incentive analysis by the analyst:
Each actor has a clear reason to frame the situation differently.
- **Iran** denies refusal to avoid appearing as the obstacle to peace while reserving the right to reject terms it deems unacceptable. Domestically, admitting to talks while under attack is politically costly.
- **Pakistan** denies failure to preserve its credibility as a mediator and to keep the door open for future negotiations.
- **The WSJ** reported what mediators told them – that Iran is unwilling to meet. That may be true as a statement of current position, even if Iran denies it publicly.
**Tweet 7**
Second-order effect:
The dispute over who said what to whom reveals a deeper reality: indirect talks are happening, but they are stalled. Iran has not said “no forever” – but it has not said “yes” either.
The analyst notes: the gap between the WSJ report and Tehran’s denial may be narrower than it appears. Both can be true: Iran is unwilling to meet *under current terms*, but has not formally closed the door.
**Tweet 8**
The analyst’s conclusion:
✅ Fact: The WSJ reported Iran is unwilling to meet US officials in Islamabad.
✅ Fact: Iran denies this characterization, calling it misrepresentation.
✅ Fact: Pakistan denies the mediation effort has collapsed.
✅ Fact: On the ground, no breakthrough has occurred. Tehran has not given a clear green light.
The stalemate is real. The question is whether it is a permanent rejection or a negotiating posture. The analyst’s role is to verify the conflicting claims – and leave the interpretation to the user.
---
🧭 My work focuses on decision‑oriented strategic analysis.
Not commentary. Not advocacy.
I analyze incentives, constraints, and second‑order effects.
Structured, multi‑layer strategic analysis available via bio.
⚖️ Marco | Independent Analyst
@SkyNews 🚨🇮🇷 BREAKING
Iran’s Foreign Minister officially rejects false Indian and Western media reports claiming Iran refused mediation talks in Pakistan.
He says Iran is grateful to Pakistan’s efforts for mediation and peace and has never refused to go to Islamabad.
UPDATE: Jameson Creek Road is now open at Empire Grade. Early this morning, a semi truck had to swerve and make a sudden stop to avoid running into a large boulder in the road. The semi was not damaged and did not hit the boulder, but the truck became stuck and blocked the road for several hours.
The driver believes the boulder was shaken from a hill and rolled into the road due to the earthquake. @sccounty@CHPscrz #CaWx
@IRanMediaco The level of self hatred and stupidity in TDS America is stunning. That’s the real threat to America. This like all wars is a propaganda war. This generation of America needs to learn both confession and resilience. The loudest voices are the fewest and they are radicalized.
@IRanMediaco Good. Because negotiating with Trump or his regime isn't representing US, actual Americans who NEVER wanted this. He doesn't represent the vast majority of Americans!!!