Uncle Steven

Uncle Steven....perhaps the greatest man to live! ******* Member of Muffaluffagus and several secret quilting cabals. ******* 1. Bourbon. 2. Ladies. 3. Repeat.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@Mimiiben1 @usagi53700 I mean, technically it’s correct. Sort of. If you go around the circle one additional time. 150 + 360 = 510.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@Mimiiben1 X = 150.

In the top triangle the unknown angle is 100 degrees (all triangles total 180 degrees: 40 + 40 + 100 = 180).

Therefore the opposite angle in the bottom triangle is also 100. The angle adjacent to x (supplementary angle) is 30. (50 + 100 + 30 = 180.) Therefore x is 150.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@DonutsQueen2 @MsBubzzyNase @ChristnNitemare Correct. If she’d only said the magic words, “if there’s a b*mb on this plane, do you know where you would go?” then safety mechanisms would have kicked in. She said the same thing, but those with similar beliefs can’t see because they weren’t taught to develop critical thinking.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@BrandonM13997 @bleezy_eth @MsBubzzyNase @ChristnNitemare It’s okay, we get it. Christians don’t believe in consent and that’s why they don’t teach their children about it. It’s the perpetuation of our culture as we know it.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@5stringTex @BMcGrewvy When it comes to Constitutional protections, paying taxes, and taking responsibility for their actions, it’s a ministry. All other times of the year: chuh-ching!

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@easternair355 @pepe_hermit This is so disgusting. Suicidality does not come from any of the places you are suggesting. I get that you are trying to understand for yourself, but there are lots of great books and articles on this subject. Asking these things of a grieving parent one day removed is hateful.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@TheVailingBow @ArielElyseGold @mattlieb @tparsi But satire and rage bait are two different things. Satire is discernible and makes a point by showing the absurd logical ends of a cultural train of thought. Rage bait is lying to farm engagement.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@a_kept_1 @AdamShort143 Can you quote which statements in the article lead you to believe that? I see good journalism from a source based outside of the Christian culture of the US. It mentions facts that are interesting and contextual, and does so without opining.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@KarenBoyanton @AdamShort143 He was getting out ahead of much worse facts that were likely to come out. And with as many people still saying, ‘I don’t really see any difference—he still confessed’ after more victims’ stories have come out, it’s obviously worked to some degree.

Also, Boltz isn’t a predator.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@RacheJ @AdamShort143 This is a good explainer, (allegedly) courtesy of AI—which has a history of millions of previous documents, fact sets, and PR statements at its disposal to be able to pinpoint exactly what is diabolical about it.

(I have no relationship to either post.)

https://t.co/P8TT8MBs5Q

[Susan Danielle @realprophetguy]

Fantastic analysis here on how it’s more deflection and minimization than substance:

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@markcparrett @AdamShort143 I think failing to mention there were (allegedly) children involved could be charitably described as…dishonest.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@rickychecko @TuckerPoodleMA @Jerry11029355 @joewantsadrink Exactly, but if the cop doesn’t need to enter a password, just to hold the phone up to someone’s face, then unlocked info on the phone can fall under ‘plain sight’ or reasonable suspicion like when a cop sees a baggie of weed on the back seat or blood dripping out of a trunk.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@kikayon_matzui @ArielElyseGold @mattlieb @tparsi If you look at the post it is in response to, this is clearly satire in response to sarcasm. Not a Poe.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@mirmir470 @ArielElyseGold @mattlieb @tparsi Not rage bait. Look at the sarcasm of the original post. It’s satire.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@TheVailingBow @ArielElyseGold @mattlieb @tparsi If you look at the thread it is in response to you’ll be able to fully see the sarcasm.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@brainiac3397 @ArielElyseGold @mattlieb @tparsi Exactly. Glad you got the sarcasm font!

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@TuckerPoodleMA @steellt78 @QuadDaddyy @joewantsadrink It’s exactly what the post is about. OP is a public defender. These are the cases they see every single day. Maybe you’re finally getting that you’ve gone way beyond the scope of what is being addressed here?

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@TuckerPoodleMA @Gordon80916 @WorshipTheCross @joewantsadrink I suggest you research the OP’s tweet! He’s talking about the 5 minutes when a cop can detain someone without probable cause. They don’t have time to get a warrant (or a freaking NSL, lololol). They CAN make you open your phone w/ your face, but CANNOT make you give your pw.

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@TuckerPoodleMA @BrokeMyChair @joewantsadrink I think you missed this above (when I and several other people shared it…and it’s even the same info as what you pasted, but you aren’t reading it carefully):

https://t.co/fVGn99ak4g

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@TuckerPoodleMA @joewantsadrink And when PD use an Exigent Circumstances form to get phone info from the cell company, that’s only subscriber & location info (yes, they can track your phone in certain cases), not passcode/passwords to access info on the phone itself—that still requires a warrant. 2/2

[Uncle Steven @DrunkleSteven]

@TuckerPoodleMA @WorshipTheCross @andywilliamsmu @joewantsadrink I think you’re confused about what OP is talking about. And it’s okay to be confused as long as you don’t keep doubling down on it. So please read.

It’s not about what info the govt can get, it’s about how quickly they can get it. FaceID is immediate. NSL & warrant aren’t.