@clement_molin@DelwinStrategy The destruction of logistics hubs such as Wildberries leads to reduced inefficiency in retail markets, reducing tax revenues through a reduction in sales and movement of sales to platforms that operate in gray areas of the economy.
It reduces funds available for the War.
@Sasha_Etkind I doubt food security will be an issue. Russia has ample capacity to produce and import food. If logistics is given preferential treatment for fuel, the show will roll on.
Whether people get the food they want (especially due to prices) is another matter.
@BPartisans This seems highly unlikely as there are numerous systems that can bring down aircraft, all of which can be tested using drones (no need to risk valuable aircraft).
@Korea_Defense Housing troops in South Korea (and elsewhere) significantly lowers the Pentagon's expenses (both through cost-sharing and being lower-cost countries) whilst improving their force positioning.
@nexta_tv China built substantive storage so they purchase far more oil than they consume whilst oil is dirt cheap, allowing them to dampen demand during supply crises (such as now).
@Beefeater_Fella What is often missed is underemployment. With the labour market so tight, a lot of companies are reducing the time employees work so they can retain them if needed. The result is a continued tight labour market but a decrease in take-home pay.
@war_noir Given the gun culture of the USA and the lack of regulations that follow this, it would be more newsworthy if anyone in the Americas was fighting with a non-US military-grade weapon.
@MichaelFieldNZ Essentially, this is the main problem with a lot of infrastructure investments in low income countries; serves short-term political interests but has long-term social costs.