@blueicehiggins Hey John, I hear these points and agree with your back-of-envelope calculations. Have you communicated with @Isometric_HQ @PuroCO2Removal or @CascadeClimate on your concerns? We need your experienced advice and wisdom here more than ever.
@blueicehiggins@_david_ho_ You’re right, John, that we observe much retardation of the released weathering products even within the soil profile. We’re working to define how these net subprocesses (adsorption, inclusions, co-precipitation) limit ERW efficacy and on what timescales.
AGU attendees (and other SF-based individuals working in carbon sequestration tech), Funga and Eion are hosting a CDR Happy Hour following the AGU session “Science-Based Gigaton-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal” on Thursday afternoon. We hope you'll join us!
https://t.co/2dlrs4O05U
@Jeffinerca@allegra_mayer@carbon_180 Sensed the audience wasn’t in fear or shock, but rather intrigued by the concept of buying CDR and also incorporating policy-driven practice changes (Buy-and-Rent vs either/or). Allegra’s poster at Goldschmidt Lyon ‘23 was a great pitch for this!
@_neilhacker Enjoy coffee at a local park in the morning, watch an English premier league game at a pub, treat yourself to nice groceries (Grand Central Market!), cook a nice impromptu dinner for a friend :-)
@anupama_khan @FECMgov @MICleanEnergyRD@CEM14_MI8 By extension, open and collaboratively developed protocols with proper incentives in monitoring. In ERW this includes methods to replicate field trial procedures across various geo-climatic regions.
@dpaessler@RobertHoglund@carbon_drawdown@RSteffanides@JensHammes@IngridSmet_geo Thanks for your thoughts and research, Dirk. Each MRV approach has measurement artifacts that impact comparability to a certain extent. Gas/liquid/solid in theory should reconcile each other, but one approach may have greater uncertainty over another.