@Para_Capital@BULLOFBRITAIN Meta pretty much refuted the claim that they’re anticipating cutting capex. Even implied that they expect things to accelerate in the coming months.
Which is why I think Korea was so strong tonight
@crux_capital_@Kente_Clarke I think it’s currently a race between AMD and NVDA to lock up the upcoming supply from AAOI
It’s more important for AMD to get a deal done, but Jensen is probably trying to box out AMD, because why not?
@taobanker META is considering creating a cloud compute business the same way Trump is considering peace deals with Iran
Stock drops too much? Leak positive headlines
@ak_dfranco@BULLOFBRITAIN Everyone is interested in other momentum AI plays at the moment, something big like AMD can bring that volume back in.
But for now photonics does not have a spotlight on it, outside of GLW
@DollarCostAvg This is a little stale btw, this was Rosenblatt on AAOI x AMD last week.
With a belief that NVDA is now talking to them too (who are probably trying to box out AMD from strengthening their supply chain)
@joedab12 Those long term agreements MU announced are exactly what the AI trade needed to see
If memory is locked up at exorbitant prices due to insatiable demand for the next couple years, the rest of the AI capex buildout should expect the same
@valuedrift I think it’s noise unless futures go decently under closing price.
Somehow a lot of people have gotten caught offsides short again by Trump lol, and are in a bad spot
@napoleon21st@nortonbreads The core thesis of the article revolves around AAOI’s 800G product and how the article claims they won’t deliver or scale. And that hyperscalers won’t be interested in their product.
They are currently delivering and scaling their 800G product to hyperscalers.
@napoleon21st@nortonbreads This article is worried about them not shipping 800G to hyperscalers. They’re currently delivering to two hyperscalers as of what they’ve said in their past earnings call.
So the core thesis of this 2025 article is invalidated on that alone.