Federico Dugaso

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@al_f4lc0n this is crazy

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@only01Essential is your strategy to target only programs that don't have bounties so you don't have competition xd nice

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@cantinasecurity @injective i remember that one guy that got paid 50k instead of 500k, now they are moving on the scam platform of excellence, 😂😂

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@usetraceix @krigshaw this is how you treat whitehats 😂😂😂 insane

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@C2IRIS our government is controlled by israel aka the devil, so you’d definitely be a bad guy

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

man if Monero was a stablecoin i’d only buy that stg

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@ElliotSecOps @immunefi honestly i agree with this, it prevents slop.
The real question is, does it refund on duplicates?

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@Zirotituli @seunlanlege @HackenProof @hyperbridge Let's not punish protocols that welcome whitehats

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@LoopGhost007 @MitchellAmador Oh, then, without offense, i understand more the ban.

But i agree they should never be permanent, as a web3 whitehat its completely life changing in the bad way

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@LoopGhost007 @MitchellAmador Wow, thanks for clarifying, this is really bad honestly.. one last thing if you could answer, did you just submit some invalid reports to get banned or you broke some rule?

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@LoopGhost007 @MitchellAmador but wait, i just read that you said that your confirmed findings were on other protocols/platforms.
So, do you have an actual paid report in Immunefi? Could you link your profile or something? Sorry but this is important to me.

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@LoopGhost007 @MitchellAmador Wow, did not know you could get banned even with confirmed findings, thats scary as hell honestly, for most of us this is our life work

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@MitchellAmador Thanks, great improvement!

One feedback i can give, for the latest duplication feature:
sometimes, protocol teams close a report with "duplicate" but only text-wise, they don't actually mark as duplicate selecting the original, and this just defeats the whole feature

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@LoopGhost007 @MitchellAmador wait, you had confirmed findings in immunefi and still got banned?

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@SantiTorAI how is it 5 days of work, what does it have, 30M context? lmfao

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@adrianhetman @Haxatron1 brother, he just explained to you what by “see what happens” he didn’t mean “see if bug is valid” but rather “see if protocol team is reliable and honest”, jesus christ

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@MitchellAmador @japzdivino please show the reason of invalidation of the original finding in case it got invalidated.

otherwise i have either no reason to know if decision is correct nor to learn from my mistakes

[Federico Dugaso @FDugaso]

@MitchellAmador But i myself got one of my report duped, the original report was “Closed” thus invalid and reason of invalidation was not shown.

So this does not apply to the example in this tweet