@kamikazecash It still likely outperforms SCHD, no? 13.5% is a big difference. At least a portion of that dividend should be from the underlying stocks' dividends, too... so there should be some room for a dividend increase, I'd think...
@mcuban@elonmusk "Ask them" -- we did ask them. They ignored us. The only option left is to force them, and we force them by voting to have the government do it. And now it's "socialism."
@90311fish@ScienceExpand It's not just carrying fine particles, although that's a factor. Burning stuff generally converts oxygen (O2) to carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O). A lot of those atoms come from the substance burned, so mass (& weight) will reduce.
@BenWarbecker002@kevinxu He's making bank in other accounts, I'm sure. Using this "challenge" account to pump the stocks after taking positions in other accounts, dumps in the other accounts after the immediate pump, holds in this account to breakeven to make it look like he's not selling on the pumps.
@CompoundingLab Fred mentioned credibility is a challenge for *all* miners turning to AI/HPC but that they have essentially overcome that with the Starwood partnership. He said he expects *other* miners could start running into issues executing, whereas they themselves are in a great position.
@Ayushago These moves in the other stocks happened recently. What you're noticing is an asymmetric opportunity in $MARA & $CLSK as they have yet to re-rate like the others... but they will. I wouldn't recommend selling and missing the boat.
@QtheArsenal@Dillon_Moon@brain_stimulus It's called "neural noise" if it's the normal level most people see. "Visual Snow Syndrome" if you're seeing it like all the time.
@CANCELingU@RobSamuelsIR You're very wrong. Applying a 90% haircut to future "speculative" revenue is not standard practice. Imagine where sell-side price targets would be on so many companies if that were true. Tesla? Give me a break.