Patriarchy wasn't invented. It was EARNED.
Men didn't sit in a circle one day and say "how do we oppress women?"
They were too busy trying not to let their entire bloodline get WIPED OUT by animals or invaders or bad weather.
Before feminism. Before 9-5s. Before police. Before DoorDash. There was nature, and nature is TRYING TO KILL YOU.
Someone has to kill the bear, the wolves before it kills your baby.
Something has to fight the rival tribe that wants to rape your wife and behead your sons and steal your land.
Something has to lift the boulders, chop the trees, climb the trees, build the wall, dig the trench, stand watch at 3AM in -20 degrees while his family sleeps.
Who? Tell me who does that? Women?
MEN DID IT. Because only men COULD do it.
Patriarchy is not a conspiracy. It is biology meeting survival. Men took the role of the expendable sex because someone HAD to be expendable.
And expendable they were.
The deal was simple and brutal: Women are protected and cherished inside. Men are sacrificed outside.
Women got safety. Men got the grave.
That system built every civilization on earth. Every house you live in, every road you drive on, every freedom you have was paid for by male corpses you will never know the names of.
So when you say "patriarchy oppresses women," what you really mean is "I'm ungrateful that men died so I could live long enough to hate them. If they had given you rights and freedom 400 yeats ago, humanity would have gone extinct.
This is Audrey's pinned tweet. It is hilariously ironic that Audrey quotes Nilakantha Dikshita’s Kalividambanam (Verse 1). She clearly missed the joke.
Nilakantha was satirizing fake scholars who do not know their subjects.
When he wrote 'Na boddhavyam, na sravyam... jhatiti prativaktavyam,' he was mocking charlatans who refuse to understand the subject, refuse to listen to opposing evidence & just scream immediate replies to look smart.
If she had actually read the very next verse in Nilakantha’s text (Verse 2), she would have realized she was walking into a trap. Nilakantha goes on to list the 5 ways these fake scholars try to win an argument when they lack substance:
असंभ्रमो विलज्जत्वम् अवज्ञा प्रतिवादिनि l
हासो राज्ञः स्तवश्चेति पञ्चैते जयहेतवः ll
Remaining unbothered, sheer shamelessness, showing utter contempt for the opponent, mocking them & praising the ruling powers (the King)... these 5 are their keys to victory.
This is the exact operational playbook of modern ideological historians when cornered by hard evidence.
Let me further quote the verse 3 also to get the full context:
अशिक्षितेषु वक्तव्यं सभ्येषु महता कलिना l
शिक्षितेषु तु वक्तव्यं मध्यस्थोऽयं विमत्सरः ll
If the judge is uneducated, just shout loudly to win. If the judge is smart, immediately accuse him of being biased!
Whenever an Indian scholar/community group exposes a factual error in her work using hard data, the response is rarely a factual counter-argument. Instead, she immediately claims she is being harassed/attacked by nationalists.
She & others use institutional victimhood as a shield to completely avoid answering legitimate, evidence-based academic critiques.
You do insider trading,
SEBI will ensure that you go to jail for 10 years.
Now in Bhopal, 50 top officers purchased land.
Within 16 months, a road project was sanctioned through the stretch.
Land prices increased 15 times.
But there is no corruption in India.
@alfucore Check her profile. She IS a therapist. She has mentioned in her bio. Her website even offers couples counselling. How did she even get a licence?
@MayankC30636775@AaryanPrateekX Totally agree with you but she IS a therapist as she has mentioned in bio. Her website even offers couples counselling. I wonder if she tells couples that the man in the relationship is to blame for all of their problems.
@DivijaBhasin Surprising to see this coming from someone who introduces herself as a therapist/psychologist. People in therapy are often vulnerable & need empathy—mocking men’s struggles hardly reflects the spirit of mental health care.
If a practising therapist is regularly posting such divisive & dismissive views, what kind of therapy can we expect for vulnerable people? Isn’t a therapist supposed to empower, not spread hate?
Oh noo baccha this is sooo scaryyy🫨
Men should be more careful❤️🩹😣
They should protest by not getting married 🥺🥺🥺
That will show women who’s in charge 😤😤😤
@nipra1701 Mangalsutra isn’t some random ‘patriarchal tag.’ It began as a protective charm—wives wore it praying for husbands’ long life when men went to battles & hunts. That’s cultural symbolism, not oppression. Equating it with hijab shows zero grasp of context or history.
@nipra1701 @Windsofchange72 Mangalsutra isn’t some random ‘patriarchal tag.’ It began as a protective charm—wives wore it praying for husbands’ long life when men went to battles & hunts. That’s cultural symbolism, not oppression. Equating it with hijab shows zero grasp of context or history.
@thewritingdev@MySutradhar His Devotion to Shiva was self-serving & selfish, not like a devotee loving his God. It was trend with asuras & rakshasas to get boon for bad purposes. He forced Dharmic cosmic balance to such degree that Bhagwan Vishnu had to take avatar to take care of him.
@thewritingdev@MySutradhar he once tried to lift Mount Kailash to show off. Bhagwan Shiva crushed his ego by pinning him down until he sang hymns. That hymn came from fear and desperation.
This is a distortion of both history and Shivaji Maharaj’s legacy.
Shivaji Maharaj was not “denied” the title Chakravarti — he chose the title Chhatrapati deliberately. It wasn’t a Brahminical downgrade; it was a civilizational declaration.
“Chakravarti” is a mythological, pan-cosmic emperor concept found in Puranic and Buddhist texts.
“Chhatrapati”, coined under Shivaji, means the king who protects (umbrella/Chhatra) his people — a real-world title of sovereignty, not celestial symbolism.
Shivaji Maharaj underwent a grand Vedic coronation in 1674 with the help of Gaga Bhatt, a Brahmin scholar from Kashi.
They didn’t suppress him — they restored Hindu kingship after centuries of foreign domination.
If anything, Shivaji Maharaj reclaimed Dharma through the system, not by rejecting it.
Abdool, don’t reduce a Dharmic renaissance into modern caste grievance politics.
Pakistan shot down a Rafale.
We know this because social media said so.
Which knows this because The Hindu said so.
Which knows this because Reuters said so.
Which knows this because Pakistan DM said so.
Who knows this because social media said so.
If this circlejerk doesn’t convince you, we now have The Wire confirming the same.
They know this because CNN said so.
Which knows this because a “high-ranking French intelligence official” said so.
Who knows this because there’s a picture.
Does this “high-ranking official” have a name? Conveniently no.
Does he have a face? Just as conveniently, no.
Who did he talk to? Conveniently, only CNN.
But what picture, it was an old MiG, no?
Yeah but now, again conveniently, there’s another. How do we know it’s Rafale?
Well, it says—and this is the mother of all conveniences—RAFALE on its wing.
In all caps.
So which one is it? Circlejerk or convenience? Take your pick.
@theskindoctor13 Next time you say “my one vote won’t matter” — remember, someone who wasn’t even supposed to vote did.
And it mattered.
If you can’t bother to show up for your country once in 5 years, don’t complain when it stops showing up for you.
@theskindoctor13 And then we wonder why our policies are broken, why freebies win over reforms, why leaders chase votes — not progress.
When citizens sleep on voting day, others hijack democracy.
This is how nations rot — not with invasions, but from within.
Some people saw filth and dirt in Mahakumbh.
Some people saw road blocks and dead bodies in Mahakumbh.
Some people saw spirituality and divinity in Mahakumbh.
Some people saw their parents and their own dreams, fulfilled in Mahakumbh.
But NOBODY saw that not a single Hindu out of the 43.57 crores which visited, spat in anyone's juice, roti or chai.
But NOBODY saw, that not a single Hindu out of the 43.57 crores which have visited, challenged the existence of any other religion by giving a call for their genocide by shouting slogans.
But NOBODY saw that not a single Hindu out of the 43.57 crores, prayed on roads, in trains or railway stations, causing inconvenience to others.
But NOBODY saw that there were NO separate Ghats for Dalits, Brahmins, Jaat, or Agarwals. All hindus took bath together. Every Hindu was treated the same, without caste differentiation.
But NOBODY saw that out of the 43.57 crore Hindus which have visited, not a single one was left hungry, or astray.
But NOBODY saw that despite crores of Hindus visiting, no stone pelting was done on religious structures of other religions during azaan or mass.
But NOBODY saw that out of 43.57 crore Hindus which visited, not a single one tried to convert a foreigner or stake claim on anyone's land.
EVERYONE SHOULD SEE THIS !!