@bigern_ern@Rivian_DD I presume you base your assumption purely on VIN. If you look actual registration (prolly the fairest overlap to generally sound accounting) you clearly see the ramp but absolute numbers and revenue recognition will largely ramp in Q4
@awiltschko The valleys arenโt data-poor, theyโre data-private. A train maker has decades of drawings, change orders and test logs. Almost none of it ever left the building.
@KSimback My bet: the boring middle. Back-office history from non-tech firms: quotes, orders, disputes. Least glamorous, least scraped, most of the economy.
@jonah_b Depends where the supply comes from. In Germany ~114k small firms a year plan to close because the owner retires and nobody takes over (KfW). Those arenโt failing businesses. Thatโs decades of working processes.
@TheyCallMeChew@troyaitken_ Agree on trust. With that few buyers and different mandates, the real work is matching: finding the three whose mandate fits this exact data. Blasting it to everyone burns both sides.
@adithya_s_k@scaleai@earakely@scale_AI Which parts come from real data: arrivals and weather? The shipping-line agents look like the hardest part to make realistic. How a real planner and a line actually trade off a delay lives in their emails, not in public port data.
@OfirPress Outside software, #2 and #3 rarely overlap. Most tasks people actually solved never hit the web: a supplier quote, a design change, a failed inspection. They sit in company archives with the outcome attached, which also keeps them out of training data.
@willdepue imo three kinds of data bottleneck:
- data you can generate (code, math)
- data you have to wait for (bio, astronomy)
- data that already exists but is locked away (every companyโs quotes, orders, inspection reports)
last one feels like just a permission/access problem