@Hertz Reservation number L00846186E8. Now cancelled and replaced with another from another location. But no apology no compensation of any kind. Eugene S Grecheck, the renter
@Hertz I made a reservation on your site for a car to pick up at my hotel in Orlando several weeks ago. The reservation was accepted and was active on the site. I happened to ask the hotel desk today where the Hertz desk was and they told me it hasn’t been here for years! 1/
So I called to find out what to do and the rep said yes, it is closed but my only option was to cancel it and find another location! No apology, no compensation of any kind. Is this how you treat your customers now?
@Hertz I made a reservation on your site for a car to pick up at my hotel in Orlando several weeks ago. The reservation was accepted and was active on the site. I happened to ask the hotel desk today where the Hertz desk was and they told me it hasn’t been here for years! 1/
@thompn4@Beazy_Rampezy@JesseJenkins Don’t think so Nick. The taxpayer in this context is the entity that owns the plant and pays taxes, I.e. the generating company.
This election season, I’m supporting the always-on energy source that employs 475,000 Americans and contributes $60 billion annually to our country’s GDP. Learn more about the benefits of #nuclear energy: https://t.co/lEoaXIgHmT #NM4A2020#PresidentialDebates
We have lost a true champion of nuclear energy in the passing of David Blee.
David, I close this tweet with a final quote for you 😔: "We believe that trailblazing the advance of nuclear energy technology...is one of the key imperatives for US market competitiveness." -David Blee
@CarlsonEngineer @ANS_org@monacharenEPPC@LungAssociation Each of those decisions was made by companies responding to market conditions that completely ignore the environmental benefits of #nuclear. Climate change requires #policy changes that reward non emitting generation.
@Ti_Enjoli@nuclearkatie@ewarren What makes sense is that tired ideologies and pandering to your base will always trump science. You can always find some scientist to back up whatever nonsense you need to meet your preconceived biases.
Exactly! And yet for some reason when others do the same thing (ignore science), they are largely criticized but Warren and Sanders seem to get excused. Ignoring science is wrong whoever does it
It is past the time that political would be leaders be called out for repeating the tired old anti nuclear canards. We are either serious about reducing CO2 emissions or we are not.
Bernie’s new climate plan brands nuclear energy as a “false solution.” In fact, what he is proposing is a false choice. The tired “nuclear vs renewables” story only serves to constrain our carbon-free options when we must expand them to reach 0x50.
I guess I should know better by now, but I have been truly discouraged by the number of people I have talked to who believed without question the ridiculous nonsense about radiation presented in the HBO program. It is encouraging to see the facts presented in such a lucid way.
Do you believe in witches because you saw a historical drama set during the middle ages and all the characters believed in witches? Similarly with HBO's Chernobyl. It was great TV, but not particularly good history, and the science was witchcraft level https://t.co/k62BN1pjog
As an industry we need to do a better job of helping individuals and companies understand that “clean” doesn’t just equate to “renewable.” Nuclear plants are by far the largest source of carbon-free energy, operate 24 hours a day, and require significantly less land.
Fifty years ago today the most remarkable adventure in human history began with the launch of Apollo 11. It reminders us what we can achieve when we take counsel of our hopes rather than our fears, when we dare to do not the easy but the hard, and when we pursue our dreams.