“This Video Was The Day Nigerian Forces Stormed Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s Compound In Afara Ukwu Ibeku, Umuahia In Broad Daylight. You Can Still Hear His Voice In The Video. They Tried To Break Into His Room And End Him. When The Gate Refused To Yield, They Turned Their Armored Vehicle’s Heavy Guns On His Window And Opened Fire Without Mercy.
“That Fateful Day, Over 28 Unarmed, Fearless Biafran Sons Paid The Ultimate Price. Among Them Was MNK Own Cousin. We Honor Their Blood. We Will Never Forget Their Stand. Their Courage Remains a Permanent Scar On The Conscience Of This Country.
“Till This Very Day, The Bullet Holes And The Destruction From That Vicious Attack Are Still Visible When You Visit His Home. The Walls Still Carry The Marks. The Evidence Of The Attempt To Silence Him Refuses To Disappear.
“Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Could Have Chosen The Easy Path. He Could Have Struck a Deal, Walked Free, And Lived In Comfort Somewhere Far From Danger. Many Of Those Now Attacking Him Would Have Signed That Deal In a Blink Of An Eye Without a Second Thought. But He Refused. He Chose The Harder Road: Prison, Isolation, And Constant Threat, Rather Than Betray The Cause.
“That Is Why He Is a True Hero. Not The Loud Ones Who Appear Only When It Is Safe. Not The Faceless Critics Who Never Faced a Single Bullet. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Stood When It Cost Everything. Those 28 Stood With Him. Their Sacrifice And His Unbroken Will Cannot Be Erased By Opportunistic Voices. Show This Video To Every Pretender Who Thinks They Can Lace His Shoes. The Blood That Was Shed That Day Still Speaks. The Man Who Refused To Sell Out Still Stands. No Deal-Maker, No Latecomer, And No Keyboard Gangster Will Ever Take His Place. We Remember. We Honor The Fallen. And We Remain Unshaken.
#FreeMaziNnamdiKanu @UKinNigeria@USinNigeria@EUinNigeria@AmnestyNigeria@UN
🔥🔥🔥” The terrorist is your government. The people in government are the terrorists…there is no farmer-herder crisis in Nigeria. I’m a herder myself…I’m closer to 1 million, the number of cattle I have. And I’ve not killed anybody before. Those who kill are killing to displace people from locations where there are natural resources….remove these politicians and terrorism will go away.”
Wow! Who’s this guy? This is one of the boldest I’ve come across in a long long time.
Salvation is never guaranteed until boldness comes into a perfect union with raw, undiluted truth.
@realDonaldTrump@POTUS@JDVance@SecRubio@SecWar@HouseAppropsGOP@RepRileyMoore@SenTedCruz@StateDept@DeptofWar@FoxNews@CBNNews@GC_Relief@USinNigeria@CENTCOM@USAmbUN@FaulknerFocus
IN CASE YOU MISSED THIS...
The Abia State House of Assembly has passed the Property and Tenancy Bill, which will establish a new Property and
Tenancy Regulatory Authority to sanitize the real estate agent business in the state.
Key points:
• Agency fees are now capped at 5% of total rent.
• Every agent operating in Abia must register with the new Authority
• The law becomes effective once Governor Alex Otti signs it.
This would be a big relief for tenants tired of exploitative agent charges.
No body born of a woman can erase or dominate the IGBO RACE.
Billing Graham broke through the walls of Igbo history.
British fears the sound of that name ~IGBO~
This Was a Real Event That Happened In Kano In 1966. The K!lling Of Igbos In Northern Nigeria, Including At Kano Airport, Was One Of The Tragic Events That Deepened The Crisis And Contributed To The Chain Of Events Leading To The Nigerian Civil War In 1967. The Scene Is From Half Of a Yellow Sun, Based On Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Novel, Which Dramatizes Events Surrounding The War And The Experiences Of Those Who Lived Through It.
8/21/2026
PM SIMON EKPA CLARIFIES: USB WAS DECLARED IN LAHTI FINLAND WITH 40 STATES
Today in the Magistrate Court Lahti, the Prime Minister of the United States of Biafra, His Excellency Simon Ekpa, made it clear for the record:
The United States of Biafra was declared in Lahti.
The Declaration included 40 States (listen to the 2 voices of the PM in court today attached)
Anyone passing a different information must stop immediately.
The Declaration of the United States of Biafra on *29th November 2024* took place in Lahti, Finland, with delegates from the 40 United States of Biafra, and was witnessed by international observers and Biafrans worldwide. Over *50 million votes* were recorded in the self-referendum leading to the Declaration.
There is only *ONE* Declaration, ONE Constitution, and ONE Government — the USB Government currently headed by the DPM Dr. Ngozi Orabueze of which Simon Ekpa is the PM and MNK is the Leader.
All Biafrans, all media, and all USB officials are directed to use *Lahti Declaration — 40 States* only. Any other narrative is false and must be corrected.
*Our Eye Remains On The Ball.*
Signed:
Dr. Ngozi Orabueze
DPM/ Head of BRGIE/Defacto
@cnni@cnnbrk@BBCBreaking@MobilePunch@AmnestyNigeria@amnestyusa@realDonaldTrump@StateDept@SecRubio@mrubin1971@MikeArnoldTruth@WalidPhares@RealTomHoman@MikeCollinsGA@netanyahu@IHRF_English@UNHumanRights@jihadwatchRS@tedcruz@SaharaReporters@vanguardngrnews@FoxNews@channelstv@ARISEtv@alexstubb@yleuutiset@Huuhkajat@UN_HRC@FBIDirectorKash@FBI@INTERPOL_HQ@Interpol@CIA
SHOW HIM THE LAW: NIGERIA CANNOT HIDE BEHIND PUBLIC LEGAL ILLITERACY
By Barrister Christopher Chidera, Esq.
I fully support the Okwu-Kanu Family’s call for the immediate listing and determination of Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s pending matters before the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal.
The question is becoming embarrassingly simple:
Why is the Federal Government running from the courtroom?
Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has repeatedly asked that his matters be heard. If the Federal Government believes that his conviction is legally sound, it should come to court and defend it.
There is nowhere to hide.
More importantly, Nigerians must not be misled by the apparent simplicity of a court saying, “Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is hereby convicted,” and then pointing to a savings clause as though that ends the constitutional inquiry.
It does not.
The Nigerian public may understandably not be conversant with the technicalities of criminal law. But public legal illiteracy cannot become a substitute for the Constitution.
Section 36(12) requires a criminal offence and its punishment to be prescribed by written law. The relevant question therefore cannot be avoided:
What was the extant written law governing the offence and punishment at the time Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was convicted on 20 November 2025?
If the law under which he was convicted had already been repealed, then the constitutional question does not disappear simply because a savings provision has been invoked.
A savings clause is not a penal statute.
It does not create the offence.
It does not prescribe the punishment.
It is not, by itself, the written criminal law contemplated by Section 36(12).
Its function is to preserve specified legal consequences—such as proceedings, investigations or liabilities—according to the precise language of the saving provision.
It does not magically transform a repealed criminal statute into an extant penal law.
Any argument that a repealed criminal law can simply become extant and subsisting merely because a savings clause has been invoked would invite an extraordinary question before the courts and, indeed, before the wider common-law world.
That distinction may be lost on the general public.
It cannot be lost on lawyers.
And it certainly cannot be lost on a government prosecuting a criminal case.
THE COURT OF APPEAL MUST NOW EXPOSE THE ISSUE
This is precisely why the appellate proceedings matter.
The Government cannot rely upon the assumption that Nigerians will hear the words “savings clause” and simply conclude that the entire legal problem has disappeared.
It has not.
The Court of Appeal will have to confront the actual statutory framework:
What law was in force when the conviction was entered?
What written law defined the offence?
What written law prescribed the punishment?
What happened to Section 97 of the TPPA 2022, which provides for proceedings commenced under the repealed legislation to be continued and completed under the 2022 Act?
And if the answer is that a savings provision preserved the old proceedings, the next question remains:
Where is the extant written law satisfying Section 36(12) under which the conviction itself was entered?
These are not complicated questions.
They are questions of law.
They are the very questions Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was asking at trial when he demanded:
“SHOW ME THE LAW.”
He now asks the Court of Appeal the same question.
Show him the law.
If the Federal Government believes the answer is favourable to it, let it come to court and give that answer.
Let it explain Section 97 of the TPPA.
Let it explain Section 98(3).
Let it identify the operative, extant and subsisting written law upon which the conviction was entered.
@StateDept@USinNigeria@FCDOGovUK@KnessetENG@UNHumanRights@UN@officialABAT@njcNig@NigerianBarz@NGRSenate@IBAnews@GuardianNigeria@amnesty@AmnestyNigeria