@dotey Tripo to Blender for retopo still feels fragile on complex chars. Have you hit topology issues around the face area, or is the mesh clean enough to skin directly
@GoogleDeepMind@TIME 180 billion watermarked is one thing, the real test is whether a normal person checking a forwarded video can actually see the signal. The API and browser extension integration is where this either takes off or stays a lab demo
@AnthropicAI The Conceptual Reasoning track is the interesting one - putting philosophers and cognitive scientists in the same loop as the model builders is where alignment actually gets testable. Hope the selection isn't another black-box screening
@OpenAI Love that you're pairing the funding with free compute. So many grants fund the idea but leave researchers fighting for GPUs - seeing Prover and similar tools get real compute budget is the bit that actually moves the needle
@mfpiccolo real pain is agent sessions spawning panes and burying your review pane, so the "which agent is waiting" bit is where it'd save time. worth trying with lint and tests together to see if pane routing stays sane
@halcyonedge the opus-default cost thing is real, every workflow agent runs on the session model by default. gonna try it on a small dir and route sonnet for most coding plus haiku for simple subagent steps. will watch the token delta vs a normal convo to see if the throughput is worth it
@liorpesoa review the diff first for any scary permissions or db stuff, then spin up a staging branch and click through. for visual things like snips id rather just open it tbh, hard to diff a ui change in code
@angeldot_ havent tried the 1.0 drop yet but the mit license is the real unlock. my current setup is just prompt templates wired to react components and it already breaks when the model hallucinates a prop. will give openui a spin on a side project next week to see how it handles edge cases