Single-Payer answers the wrong ques. HCRS4USA answers the right ques. & solves all of the problems its advocates rightfully want in a completely different way.
❤️ discussing policy & IMHO have the most viable sol'n yet can't fully contribute 'til pub. so seems a good time to jump off/finish (i.e. s*** or get off pot:)). Policy is m/l done. Some reading/LOTS of editing left! Being on here SLOWS progress . ❤️ y'all. Peace out✌️(for now!).
@DrDiGiorgio "...it’s destroying independent practices. ...and will accelerate consolidation."
I wouldn't have believed this when I 1st got involved in policy but over that period of time, it's become blatantly obvious this is the official, even if unwritten goal of our government.
@DrBruggeman Is anyone surprised? It's obvious the goal of gov't policy is the demise private practice. Whether that's in preparation for Single-Payer &/or some other reason is the only question.
@policywishes I'm in no way in favor of @RoKhanna's proposal, however wrt funding it, there could (would have to be) a surcharge above FICA along the lines of what private coverage currently costs (even 50-75%) for anyone under 65.
@SavageOnTheSun@victoriaregisk@ahahospitals@PhRMA As a whole that's correct - I believe US Chamber of Crony Capitalism (i.e. US Chambet of Commerce) is still the single largest but also represents healthcare interests.
But in the case of 340B we have 2 (maybe 3?) competing healthcare interests: Hospitals, Pharma, & maybe PBMs.
@RealJoeGrogan@ahahospitals is one of the most powerful lobbies in DC so wouldn't hold my breath for meaningful 340B reform however on the other side @PhRMA is also powerful so will be interesting to see what happens.
@CarolynMcC@RoKhanna "Medicare For All" (NOT what I'd advocate) is Medicare by name only & ONLY for political reasons. In reality, it's Medicaid For All & a political impossibility as proposed. Congress is NOT putting health insurers out of business. IMHO, we'd get "Medicare Advantage For All."
@mcuban But even during the deductible phase, prices are not easily shoppable. You're not cash-pay yet you're paying cash. You still have to be in-network. You're relying on the 3PP having negotiated the "best price" for you but every plan has a different price for the same service.
@kenjaques@JordanAbbottMD 100% agree w/the 1st quote. It must ALL be torn down & replaced! There's no fixing our "system."
2nd not so much. It was never really "designed" per se. It evolved via patchwork although certainly the healthcare industry has plugged in, via legislation, "fixes" to THEIR benefit!
@JordanAbbottMD Seems the biggest day to day drivers of burnout (setting aside the root cause of everything - our 3PP model) are (1) EHR & (2) Prior Auth
@moylubimykroko@mcuban "Medical care isn't expensive. Healthcare IS!" - @GallaherCaren
Premiums are based on actuarial risk. Deductibles have an inverse relationship to premiums (higher ded. = lower premium) but have nothing to do with the actuarial risk.