after failing to come up with a single academic refutation. They're now attacking him (حفظه الله) for being too thorough in his lessons. This gave me a good laugh. The panic and desperation shines through
@AbuRaaf3 Furūʿ al-fiqh is not your wife to control how someone teaches it.
Secondly, if he taught it in a brief, shallow manner, you would be the first to criticize him and claim he has no ʿilm. But when he goes into detail, you criticize that as well.
From the Mashayikh who are alive, I haven’t benefited from anyone more so, and quite frankly it’s not even close, than Shaykh Musa Jibril حفظه الله تعالى. He’s a man who lives what he preaches from A to Z, and apart from his heart soothing reminders, you learn from how he treats people. His actions and his mannerisms with the Muslims are his biggest Da’wah, may Allah preserve him, and smite every tongue who slanders him.
The Madkhali crowd, whilst loud and obnoxious, largely comprise of intellectual deprived and unemployed bums who have nothing going on in life, apart from being full time Zanadiqa. This leads them to think spam calling someone whose age qualifies them to be their great grandfather, is a good use of their time, whilst they giggle like little girls. That’s without even mentioning the Rafidhi esq Taqiyyah that was employed.
Not to mention the “gotcha” athar that was used (already refuted) — not a single one of the Madkhali scholars has used this as proof for saying Legislating Laws is “Kufran Duna Kufr.” That itself should tell you everything you need to know. Being academically deprived, leads one to believe that silence or indifference, or a belittling “I don’t know” in the face of their intellectual handicap and attempted deception, is somehow a victory for them. It’s cringe and pathetic, which is just another day in the office for the Madākhilah, may Allah cleanse the Ummah from their filth.
From the Book: مكارم الأخلاق ومعاليها ومحمود طرائقها
Chapter: Compassion toward daughters, treating them well, and the virtue therein.
634 — Naṣr ibn Dāwūd al-Ṣāghānī narrated to us: ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿAmr, from the people of Mecca, narrated to us: Ṭalḥa ibn Zayd narrated to us, from al-Aʿmash, from Abī Wāʾil, who said:
A daughter of ʿAbd Allāh bin Masʿūd came forward — she was a young girl — so he drew her to his chest, then kissed her, then said: “Welcome! O veil of ʿAbd Allāh from the Fire!”
He then said: I heard the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ say: “Whoever has a daughter, and he teaches her good manners and does so well, and he nourishes her and does so well, and he lavishes upon her from the blessing that Allāh has lavished upon him — she will be for him a protection on his right and on his left from the Fire, leading him to Paradise.”
@PiousCall You say it’s wrong, yet you go on to prove that they are kuffār. Coming fresh out of Madkhalism, this really isn’t something you should be speaking about.
“Madkhalis are a drying cult and nobody is unaware of them nowadays.”
Don't be naive.
They won't die as long as the
governments and institutions
exist to prevail them.
1/2
A request to the Madākhilah:
Please go & ask the same questions regarding Ḥukm bi-Ghayri Mā Anzalallāh that you asked Shaykh Mūsā Jibrīl & Shaykh Abū Ayman to scholars such as Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUṣaymī, al-Shuwayr, & others like them. Record their answers and present them to us here.
Years ago when both Shaykh Ahmad and his father, our beloved and favorite Shaykh Musa got sick, Shaykh Ahmad told his students,
“I don’t care about myself, just make Du’a for my father. I’d rather you make Du’a for him than me.”
A year ago while talking to Shaykh Musa, I noticed he was under the weather. When I started inquiring about him, he changed the subject and immediately said “Please make Du’a for my son Ahmad, he’s not feeling well”.
Shaykh Musa himself wasn’t feeling well, but didn’t want anyone’s attention to his own health, rather, wanted Shaykh Ahmad to be in every one’s Du’a.
Both methods are valid, the son of Ibn Qasim, who compiled them clarified this point.
Pay attention in this clip, as he is aware of both pronunciations.
Present me with any lecture of Fawzan that you select, I will identify more grammatical errors than you are aware of.
‘Shaykh’ Ahmad Musa Jibrīl, the known Khariji who claims to be the student of kibār can’t even pronounce Durarr Asaniyyah correctly, he calls it Durrar ‘Asunniyah’ and there are many more examples of blunders like this
When rabee al- madkhali died I didn't see a single Salafi student of knowledge nor scholars posted condolences (alhamdullillah) on their pages in Afghanistan, even tho scholars in Kunar knew about the news of his death.
The madkhali "dawah" is very weak in this region الحمدلله.
The Madākhilah act & think that they know very well about Al-Ḥukmu bi-Ghayri Mā Anzalallāh.
They are unaware of the difference between a general ruling and a specific judgment. Shaykh al-Islām had spoken about this in al-Majmūʿ.
Is Shaykh al-Ghunaymān wrong for this?
1/5
🧵