@MarcusFidelicus lol “critical thinker” in your bio. You dullard, you literally made the greatest possible argument against atheism possible and you don’t even know it🤣
@Mikegx00@impaulsive@LoganPaul@mikemajlak@ibrycecrawford There are some sexual proclivities that are good and ordered, and some that are disordered…. That’s my point…. Unless you think ALL sexual acts are ok (i.e. I refer you to my example: beastiality, incest, necrophilia, etc.)
…..You don’t think these are good… do you?
@shelbystardust Why do liberal women always make the most retarded faces while spewing reddit tier theological arguments and thinking that they cooked?
@Miocaenus@gigilovesapple@stvr_rl I would argue sticking one’s penis into a bunghole Is overdoing it. You may disagree and enjoy it. That is your preference. Has nothing to do with objective morality
@Miocaenus@gigilovesapple@stvr_rl You are an arbiter because it ultimately boils down to your preference for what is moral in your worldview. Christianity provides an external unchanging moral standard that is not based on if you enjoy taking it up the ass.
Also argument from nature is a fallacy.
@Miocaenus@gigilovesapple@stvr_rl Eating is pleasurable, yet gluttony and overindulgence is a sin.
Spending money is pleasurable, but greed is a sin.
Your point is ill-formed. Also your hubris is showing to think you are the sole arbiter of morality