Even Arab leaders admit it.
Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see.
Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective.
Ok, so let us set that aside.
Now watch this.
In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada.
Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance.
He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises.
The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978.
This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel.
When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias.
The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return.
This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today.
If you value the truth, please share.
Reform has WON another by-election, in Westmorland & Furness, with more votes than Labour and the Tories COMBINED!
➡️ RFM: 48.4% (New)
🌹 LAB: 24.5% (-9.8)
🌳 CON: 19.0% (-21.5)
🌍 GRN: 5.1% (New)
🔶 LDM: 2.9% (-2.7)
Reform GAIN from Conservative - whose vote collapsed again!
Want to know why Kemi and her wets want you to stay silent on Henry’s death?
Post-2020, the Police Race Action Plan was developed under a Conservative government.
Priti Patel as Home Secretary backed it, Kemi Badenoch as Equalities Minister oversaw it. This directly shaped Hampshire Police’s Race Commitment.
Suella, as Home Secretary, refused central government funding for race action plans and did not provide Home Office backing.
Kemi and Priti Patel enabled these race-focused policies now linked to two-tier policing failures.
Obviously I don’t want to feel angry about the death of a boy as that would make me the tool of the far-right, so it would be helpful if the Government could tell me how I should feel. Annoyed? Irritated? Mildly anxious?
It's telling that the establishment is more outraged by what Nigel Farage has said about Henry Nowak's death than it is about the way in which he died.
Disgusting.
A visibly Jewish man booked into a Travelodge and was greeted with “Free Palestine”programmed into the TV in his room
Staff reportedly greeted him with a negative attitude beforehand at check in
@TravelodgeUK - I won’t ever book with you.
Sadiq Khan said last year there was no "indication of ... grooming gangs" of the Rotherham model in London.
He was wrong. This form of abuse needs a particular focus to overcome the denial and obfuscation that has blighted investigations in the capital and all over the country.
It is not hateful to ask why a dying boy was disbelieved.
Why when he said he’d been stabbed, he can’t breathe, the police standing over him saw something else.
So Home Sec was allowed to be allowed to be angry over George Floyd
But two tier lefties say we cannot be angry over Henry Nowak
Utter shameless hypocrites
Delighted to launch the official X account of Reform Friends of Israel. Follow for updates as we launch this exciting platform to promote the UK-Israel relationship with Reform UK leaders and members.
Extraordinary poll in The Times.
Reform now leads Labour among Unite members (36-30) and GMB members (31-22).
No party has ever challenged Labour's grip on the trade unions before.
This signals a tectonic shift in British politics.
Working Britain is defecting to Reform.
Reform is 3 points behind Burnham in #Makerfield.
The Tories and Restore together are on 9 points.
If you vote for either of them, you are voting for Burnham as PM. Is that really what you want?
https://t.co/nAh31tJzzK
Who does it ultimately serve when Restore attacks Reform, losing them support?
In the event Reform drop ~5-7% in a General Election, due to Restore, they'd be forced into a coalition with the Tories to stop a socialist coalition
Last year Cyabra ran a report into Lowe's sudden social media boost.
You don't become an overnight sensation online with only 8% name recognition
The report revealed a sophisticated Bot operation:
https://t.co/EL3qm242cL
Who has the money and motive to do such a thing?
Around the same time Rupert and I had a long phone call. He told me the Tories were desperately courting him. Or seemingly him, them
This was not a secret. Read for yourself. It suggests he will 'work for' the Tories:
https://t.co/GZNgVC36Xj
I've no idea who at the same time told @elonmusk that Farage should be replaced by Lowe. That's the final missing piece of the puzzle
Now, back in 2019, when we were MEPs and Boris called the election, Lowe collaborated on a list with the Tories called 'Men And Measures' with Dougie Smith. It was a list promising peerages, knighthoods and positions to Brexit Party candidates to stand down. My colleague Robert Rowland blew the whistle to me
I called it out on Question Time and handed files to the Met Police
https://t.co/U4CeMzcbj2
Lowe became the first Brexit Party candidate to step down in Dudley North just before nominations closed and Farage was due to hold a big event there
https://t.co/M7s95TTyfK
Ask yourself today
Does Lowe criticise the Tories? Or just attack Reform?
Is Restore standing in Aberdeen South where Tories are putting in loads of resources? Or just Makerfield, where they only target Reform voters?
How come Tories are silent on extreme elements of Restore - the only party to be so?
Why did Kemi give Lowe a Committee appointment?
https://t.co/N421qrSTog
Tory Peer Lord Agnew donated £20k to Lowe in 2025
https://t.co/I3rn0gkCb3
This may all be circumstantial, but it's clear Lowe still has close connections with the Tories, begged to be part of them, but instead decided to make a party to attack Reform
https://t.co/13kVnUaKI4
It is fact that the party to ultimately benefit from reducing Reform support is The Tories. It's the only way they might be able to get close to power by ensuring Reform cannot form a majority government. To do that, they needed a vehicle to go after Farage
Without a majority in Parliament, Reform won't be able to do anything they have proposed. Leaving the ECHR, deporting illegals and foreign criminals, cracking down on Islamism, overhauling immigration. The Lords, Commons, activist lawyers, civil service, will try to block everything unless Reform have a big enough majority to hold their nerve.
If they're forced into.a pact with the Tories to stop a hard left coalition, it means everything would have to be passed by the Tories. The same bloody people would still be in power. The establishment wins, yet again.
I know some Restore fanatics are fooled into thinking Reform is 'controlled opposition'. I suspect the opposite is true
I write this not because I'm working for anyone, nor have an axe to grind nor have gone mad, nor have I been promised anything, nor am I having a sordid affair
I know things others don't know because I'm one of vanishingly few people who had a front row seat for the past 6 years
I know the people involved, and I know how politics works
I want my country to get the radical change it needs. Lowe stands in the way of that. And I suspect, not by accident, joining the dots above