Thomas Wettlaufer

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@RobSchneider

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@BlokeMan00 Another convergence, with the work I did last year. Interesting!
https://t.co/3lb2V6kea0

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@jamestalarico Idiot.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@BasedMikeLee I'm surprised she didn't say, "my house".

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@JackPosobiec Better have my Cavatini on the menu.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@elonmusk @iScienceLuvr I think the "D" really just means "Dedicated"

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

Finally finished a full Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation on my Galactic rotation model and the numbers are impressive. No magic fairy dust, and still outperforms MOND and Cored DM.
https://t.co/BchYNTWj8t

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@LeadingReport

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@RobSchneider No, we have dain bramage.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@martinmbauer Also, evidence isn't fact, it just supports wishful thinking.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@NextScience I've been saying this for over a year now, all particles are quantum linked, entanglement only occurs when necessary.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@compliantvc You literally make no sense, now I see why the EU is failing.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@skdh I agree with this, my own research shows that our 3D+1 spacetime acts as a BEC and reduces the speed of Energy to 300,000 k/s which directly ties to our 2 measurements of this energy, the emergent drag, we measure as gravity and the rate of flow as time. https://t.co/F0ylSzLDil

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@PKoppenburg Thanks for the follow-up and the chart — it’s really helpful.
I’ve been looking at these spectra through a strong pattern-recognition lens, and it struck me how consistently the “new” states seem to fall into groupings rather than appearing randomly. Even the 4-quark states, while clearly breaking the old simple pattern, still seem to cluster in certain mass regions.
I’ve been playing with a very simple exploratory model that treats these as different levels of topological complexity in an underlying structure. It’s still early days (mostly toy-level at the moment), but it’s starting to suggest that there might be identifiable energetic windows or boundaries between conventional and more complex configurations.
If it develops into something that actually produces useful predictions, I’d be happy to share it. In the meantime, thanks again for the data and explanations — really appreciate you taking the time.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@PKoppenburg Congrats on the new Bc*⁺ observation — hadron #82 at the LHC is impressive.
It’s fascinating how many “new” hadrons keep appearing. I’ve been wondering whether these are truly fundamental new particles, or whether we’re mostly seeing fresh configurations (proto-versions) that emerge from the available energy and quantum numbers in each collision, filtered by underlying selection rules that only allow certain families to stabilize.
The clear groupings in the hadron spectrum seem to suggest the latter — that the vacuum + existing particles can only assemble a limited set of stable (or quasi-stable) structures. Each collision creates new ones, but they tend to fall into recognizable families rather than producing endless unrelated exotics.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@PKoppenburg Thanks for the reply.
I’ve been looking at the chart through a strong pattern-recognition lens, and what stands out to me is that most of these “new” hadrons seem to fall into clear families or groupings rather than appearing as completely unrelated new particles. It looks more like we’re seeing many different configurations and excited states within a smaller number of underlying families, with the extra mass coming from internal energy (as you described with the Bc / Bc*).
It’s fascinating how consistently the pattern repeats — same flavor content, higher excitations. Makes me wonder if future discoveries will continue filling in these families or whether we’ll eventually see something that truly breaks the grouping pattern.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@RealJamesWoods He should put the judge in jail for "aiding and abedding" and putting the populace at risk.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@RealJamesWoods "the purge" is coming to Cali.

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@VFD_org Interesting direction.
Both of us seem to be exploring the same core idea: that what we call fundamental constants (especially Λ) are better understood as emergent residues of a deeper geometric or physical closure process, rather than raw vacuum energy or fine-tuned inputs.
Your E8 → 600-cell cascade giving Λ × ℓ_P² ≈ 2.869 × 10^{-122} (within 0.078% of Planck) is strikingly close to what emerges from the elastic ZPE lattice + TVL framework when treating the cosmological constant as Lattice Expansion Pressure plus entanglement-density gradients.
One closure substrate, many observed faces — we appear to be circling the same attractor from different starting points.
Full context and derivations here:
https://t.co/99xgNdVJrZ

[Thomas Wettlaufer @InvalidSuprUser]

@GigaBasedDad She would definitely win, for dumbest politician.