@hitujiga100@a1631jp Disputes over the figures cannot alter the heinous nature of the Nanjing Massacre. The atrocities committed against Nanjing civilians—particularly the elderly, women, and children—are unforgivable.
@BlomeSune@Deadlykalesh If the people online who fabricate various pieces of misinformation could force Nepal to cede the area where the glacier collapse occurred to China—making it Chinese territory—then China would take responsibility.
@sdht20@NTayachewe12 The Chinese Civil War has not ended since 1945; this is the historical reason why the United States has had to choose one of the two governments (Beijing or Taipei)to represent China while simultaneously maintaining an ambiguous "One China" policy.
@sdht20@NTayachewe12 Do you think the Confederate States of America would agree with you—that Lincoln destroyed their homes in order to liberate enslaved people?
@sdht20@NTayachewe12 The fourth sentence of Chapter 1 of the current Constitution of the Republic of China states: "The territory of the Republic of China, according to its existing national boundaries, shall not be altered except by resolution of the National Assembly." Do you know what it means?
@sdht20@NTayachewe12 Must democracy necessarily take the form of a multi-party electoral system? Who decided that "democratic centralism"—operating under one-party rule combined with a political consultation mechanism—does not constitute a democratic system?
@realannapaulina As an ordinary Chinese person living in Beijing, I can’t help but chuckle when I watch you all on X discussing bizarre tales fueled by a persecution complex regarding China. Folks, take it easy.
@tiansview00@wangjupaian If the facts of this matter conflict with your views on China, you don't have to force yourself to comment—unless the number of comments is tied to your income. You moron.
@KeithP_Williams@badiucao I think there is a distinction between satirizing the monarchy and openly insulting Elizabeth II—both in Australia and in the UK.
@OopsGuess I disagree with your view; his professional competence has been completely underestimated by the U.S. political elite. Offering him a job as a TV commentator is nothing short of an insult—he is qualified to serve as National Security Advisor.