Honoured to have been Nominated and Gazetted for Conferment as Senior Counsel.
I accept this recognition with gratitude and a renewed commitment to serve our Country, Constitution, Court’s and clients with integrity and courage.
Asanteni sana for your support through the years.
Justice Ochieng was cut from a different cloth. He was what every judge ought to be: brilliant in mind, courageous in principle, and allergic to corruption. He understood that justice is not an ornament for speeches but the lifeblood of a civilized nation.
And perhaps that is why he has left so soon. For maybe heaven has need of such judges more than Kenya does—or maybe this earth simply has too little oxygen for both integrity and longevity to coexist on the same bench.
James Ochieng’ Oduol
@NelsonHavi@ahmednasirlaw Nelson Havi Ndungu,
It’s one thing to act for clients, but quite another to make improper imputations against a professional colleague. We must hold the line on civility in our discourse.
Farewell, Baba.
You carried Kenya’s hope through storms we were too afraid to face.
You bore our blame, yet still fought for our freedom.
History will vindicate you — the mirror we broke, the conscience we needed.
May your rest be gentle, and your dream live on in us.
James Ochieng’ Oduol
@ArundaLaw@EACCKenya@KeNHAKenya In sum the City Cabanas case reveals a emerging and disturbing truth: That some legal professionals can become the most effective instruments of fraud, when they abandon their duty to the court in pursuit of client interest — no matter how spurious. !!!!
Please fully disclose You and your clients role in :
1.•Drafting and filing pleadings that misrepresent material facts,
including:
•Falsely alleging allotment or ownership;
•Misstating the location and size of the land;
•Suppressing facts about the lawful registration of Rosaline Njeri Macharia.
2. Use of Forged or Fraudulent Documents
•Submitting:
•Fake allotment letters;
•Forged deed plans;
•Fabricated titles not traceable to any lawful grant or registration.
3. Concealing Contradictory Evidence
•Failing to disclose:
•Known discrepancies in survey and registry data;
•Prior rejections of Mr. Namanya’s claim by public bodies;
•Adverse findings from prior proceedings.
4. Coaching Witnesses and Tolerating Perjury
•Facilitating or tolerating perjured testimony by clients or state officials;
•Obstructing efforts to test the veracity of documentary evidence;
•Withholding full disclosure under discovery obligations.
5. Rotating Legal Representation to Frustrate Justice
•Mr. Namanya has engaged over 20 different advocates in a deliberate strategy to:
•Obscure continuity of representation;
•Avoid accountability for misleading the court;
•Exhaust opposing parties and judicial resources.
And you are his able aid!!
The Advocates (Practice) Rules and the LSK Code of Standards impose clear obligations on legal practitioners, including: - Duty of honesty and candor to the court - Duty to uphold the rule of law and the Constitution - Prohibition against assisting in fraudulent, dishonest, or illegal conduct -Perjury or presenting forged documents.
Let’s start here!
@ArundaLaw@EACCKenya@KeNHAKenya Having failed in the mission to fraudulently take over the City Cabanas land and Hotel. They have suddenly become clever and have unearthed a 24 Billion Fraud .
Advocates as Facilitators of Fraud upon the Court
The City Cabanas case has had a change of 20 Advocates since 2016.
Their Role and engagement;
•To draft and file pleadings that misrepresent material facts or suppress known inconsistencies in land documents.
•To present, knowingly, false allotment letters, forged deed plans, or fraudulent titles as authentic.
•Coach witnesses to give false testimony or fail to disclose perjury by clients or state officials.
Overall Effect;
•Courts are misled into upholding fraudulent Land claims.
•Judicial time and resources are wasted on manufactured disputes.
•The legal process is weaponized to displace legitimate property holders.
Present and past Lawyers complicit in the Cabanas Lands Fraud matter or similar land disputes involving fraudulent claims have: - Filed pleadings based on forged or inconsistent allotment letters - Presented testimony from public officials known to have committed perjury. - Suppressed expert evidence disproving their client's land claim - Facilitated judicial decisions adverse to constitutionally protected private owners land rights.