Maricopa County leaders want our votes. Citizens deserve a voice too: a FORMAL complaint process with an independent Compliance Review. That’s the gap.
The integrity of elections is still very much at stake and has been because of the lack of governance and contract compliance oversight at both county and state levels in the state of Arizona.
There’s a problem when statutes are written to hinder oversight.
There’s a problem when citizens have no voice and that’s exactly what is happening in Maricopa County specifically.
Basically, a citizen cannot go directly to the state to get a complaint investigated. State level complaints are normally being brought by an elected official.
Citizens will normally have two options to get a complaint heard by their proper process, which is the Board Of Supervisors.
The Citizen has two options to be heard if they want to bring a valid complaint forward
1. Talking into the microphone at a Board Of Supervisor meeting during public comment.
2. Send an email.
Neither of those two are standards. A citizen should accept.
So now let’s tie it back to exactly what just happened with Runback.
Since 2023, I have asked @katiehobbs@Adrian_Fontes@krismayes@stephen_richer for answers about lessons learned, contract compliance and corrective action. It is now 2026, and I still don’t have the answers I’ve been requesting.
That is why I keep pushing for a documented complaint process: tracking, an accountable owner, an independent compliance officer, a written determination, and formal corrective action when a problem is confirmed—with verification and monitoring to make sure the fix actually works.
Now apply that to Runbeck. What happened? Which requirements applied? Were they followed? Who independently reviews the records? Who is responsible for correcting any confirmed failure—and where is the documentation showing it was fixed?
Saying an error won’t affect the election does not answer those questions. Even an error that does not change an election outcome deserves review and correction.
Citizens should not have to spend three years chasing answers or wait for a president to draw attention to a problem. Put the complaint on the record. Investigate it. Document the findings. Verify the correction.
If officials want public trust, show us the oversight and the evidence that it works. “Trust us” is not a corrective action plan.
@MarkStewart_AZ@ThomasGalvin@KateMcGeeAZ@DebbieLesko@Steve_Gallardo@maricopacounty@MaricopaVote@RecordersOffice@azjustinheap@realDonaldTrump@JDVance@StephenM@nickshirleyy
Been a busy three days across the state. Tonight we are in Cochise County, last night in Pinal county and before that in Maricopa county. All great events!
Just got off the debate stage after sharing the BIGGS/KERR vision for Arizona!
It’s a disgrace that John Giles wouldn’t show up for voters this evening, but it’s not a surprise.
Our ticket has a vision and a plan for Arizona. Now let’s get ready to VOTE BIGGS/KERR!
Heroic! @SecMullinDHS letter - he finds that China parts are in election machines. Can’t be used if so compromised.
Mullin also has $1b for states to use safe machines.
READ IT!
Tonight is the first ever Lt. Governor debate in Arizona history, and the Democratic cadidate John Giles refused to show up.
But go watch and meet @SineKerr, the Republican cadidate for Arizona Lt. Governor!
Go Biggs/Kerr!
https://t.co/Uj3QgdUcUl
The integrity of elections is still very much at stake and has been because of the lack of governance and contract compliance oversight at both county and state levels in the state of Arizona.
There’s a problem when statutes are written to hinder oversight.
There’s a problem when citizens have no voice and that’s exactly what is happening in Maricopa County specifically.
Basically, a citizen cannot go directly to the state to get a complaint investigated. State level complaints are normally being brought by an elected official.
Citizens will normally have two options to get a complaint heard by their proper process, which is the Board Of Supervisors.
The Citizen has two options to be heard if they want to bring a valid complaint forward
1. Talking into the microphone at a Board Of Supervisor meeting during public comment.
2. Send an email.
Neither of those two are standards. A citizen should accept.
So now let’s tie it back to exactly what just happened with Runback.
Since 2023, I have asked @katiehobbs@Adrian_Fontes@krismayes@stephen_richer for answers about lessons learned, contract compliance and corrective action. It is now 2026, and I still don’t have the answers I’ve been requesting.
That is why I keep pushing for a documented complaint process: tracking, an accountable owner, an independent compliance officer, a written determination, and formal corrective action when a problem is confirmed—with verification and monitoring to make sure the fix actually works.
Now apply that to Runbeck. What happened? Which requirements applied? Were they followed? Who independently reviews the records? Who is responsible for correcting any confirmed failure—and where is the documentation showing it was fixed?
Saying an error won’t affect the election does not answer those questions. Even an error that does not change an election outcome deserves review and correction.
Citizens should not have to spend three years chasing answers or wait for a president to draw attention to a problem. Put the complaint on the record. Investigate it. Document the findings. Verify the correction.
If officials want public trust, show us the oversight and the evidence that it works. “Trust us” is not a corrective action plan.
@MarkStewart_AZ@ThomasGalvin@KateMcGeeAZ@DebbieLesko@Steve_Gallardo@maricopacounty@MaricopaVote@RecordersOffice@azjustinheap@realDonaldTrump@JDVance@StephenM@nickshirleyy
@krismayes Are you kidding? You've already given out the ballots illegally, but you've already given them out. How many have you already given out? I think that's called cheating.
Maybe, just maybe, President Trump is on to something.
If appropriate protocols were established, in place, & immediately responsive to a circumstance like this, one might just imagine USPS refusing Runbeck's order.
The federal government agency that is USPS also failed, here.
The integrity of elections is still very much at stake and has been because of the lack of governance and contract compliance oversight at both county and state levels in the state of Arizona.
There’s a problem when statutes are written to hinder oversight.
There’s a problem when citizens have no voice and that’s exactly what is happening in Maricopa County specifically.
Basically, a citizen cannot go directly to the state to get a complaint investigated. State level complaints are normally being brought by an elected official.
Citizens will normally have two options to get a complaint heard by their proper process, which is the Board Of Supervisors.
The Citizen has two options to be heard if they want to bring a valid complaint forward
1. Talking into the microphone at a Board Of Supervisor meeting during public comment.
2. Send an email.
Neither of those two are standards. A citizen should accept.
So now let’s tie it back to exactly what just happened with Runback.
Since 2023, I have asked @katiehobbs@Adrian_Fontes@krismayes@stephen_richer for answers about lessons learned, contract compliance and corrective action. It is now 2026, and I still don’t have the answers I’ve been requesting.
That is why I keep pushing for a documented complaint process: tracking, an accountable owner, an independent compliance officer, a written determination, and formal corrective action when a problem is confirmed—with verification and monitoring to make sure the fix actually works.
Now apply that to Runbeck. What happened? Which requirements applied? Were they followed? Who independently reviews the records? Who is responsible for correcting any confirmed failure—and where is the documentation showing it was fixed?
Saying an error won’t affect the election does not answer those questions. Even an error that does not change an election outcome deserves review and correction.
Citizens should not have to spend three years chasing answers or wait for a president to draw attention to a problem. Put the complaint on the record. Investigate it. Document the findings. Verify the correction.
If officials want public trust, show us the oversight and the evidence that it works. “Trust us” is not a corrective action plan.
@MarkStewart_AZ@ThomasGalvin@KateMcGeeAZ@DebbieLesko@Steve_Gallardo@maricopacounty@MaricopaVote@RecordersOffice@azjustinheap@realDonaldTrump@JDVance@StephenM@nickshirleyy
A Sun City West constituent is voting for @AbrahamHamadeh again, and here’s why.
She and about 15 senior women sat down with him between meetings and didn’t hold back. He listened, answered their questions directly, and showed he’s down to earth and accountable to AZ-08.
That’s the kind of representative voters deserve.
Read her letter: https://t.co/HLgV3esD4V
Why has the DOJ not subpoenaed Runbeck's 2020 loading dock video from the day after the election. You know, when Adrian Fontes accepted 18,000 ballots and quietly and quickly injected them into the vote totals. I have tried numerous ways to get it, but forces more powerful than I keep it hidden. Did a delivery of 18,000 ballots actually take place the day after the election or were they simply printed?
https://t.co/p6D8mmumWS
This is exactly what I’ve been trying to get across! Contract compliance, citizen complaints and corrective action plans go hand in hand.
An independent compliance officer should review what happened, determine where the process failed, and require a formal corrective action plan when a problem is confirmed—with tracking, verification and monitoring to make sure the fix holds.
Calling out the failure is a start. Who’s following through to keep it from happening again?
https://t.co/Gnd0ry3XS8