@DTWillingham I think the spirit of their attempt to create a program is correct. We should not throw away everything related to balanced literacy, rather incorporate Science of reading and make some adjustments to balanced literacy. The two are not incompatible.
@natwexler@karenvaites It’s a strong argument that reading aloud should be part of the curriculum. I agree…more studies are definitely needed. What about decoding and fluency?
@natwexler@karenvaites Something is not quite right about this study. Simply reading aloud to children with comprehension instruction can’t possibly improve their reading comprehension that much.
@ReadingShanahan Word reading difficulty is influenced by a number of factors (frequency, word length, transparency, semantic measures, and orthographic neighborhood size). What does this imply for early reading instruction?
@buckingham_j You don’t gain the ability to climb a mountain if you only run on flat ground. Complex excerpts and easier full length novels should be part of the curriculum. Supported reading should be with excerpts, ind. Reading should be with novels.
@buckingham_j Yes, but as far as instruction goes, it makes sense to teach with excerpts. Children can read whole novels largely on their own to gain experience with extended texts.
@AlexJQuigley@ReadingShanahan You can raise the academic rigor and text complexity on an excerpt because you are teaching/scaffolding all of the hard parts but you can’t do so with a whole book. Books are best for reading ind., excerpts are best for explicit instruction.