Jeronimmo Catacycle

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

@EthicalSkeptic Thank you Roger, I hope I got the method right.

btw 1990 and 2025 : 146 weeks w/ z-score >= 1,4 : trend is definitely upward.
However,
> since 2000 : 100 wks, trend is flat
> since 2010 : 63 wks, trend downward.

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

Le Washington Mall a la caractéristique d'être orienté dans la direction du pôle alternatif Np'.
En outre, à Washington, cette direction est perpendiculaire à celle qui pointe vers le pôle nord actuel !
Ainsi, la "grille" du plan de cette ville pointe vers Np et Np'.

[strategicdepth @stratdepth]

@JohnPlatner @EthicalSkeptic @nobulart @C0RRECT1ON @th_stath Cunningham is correct, it's a dead on alignment. Freakishly so.

0.3° deviation, 30km from NP' https://t.co/p5RskpbYGe

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

@Bam_JayanFilms
Roger Cunningham a identifié 116 monuments anciens dont une des orientations principales pointe vers le point Np'.
Ce dernier, situé au sud de l'Afrique, désigne le lieu du pôle nord alternatif après basculement du globe autour du noyau (cf. théorie ECDO).

[Ethical Skeptic ☀ @EthicalSkeptic]

ECDO Interactive Viewer v. 1.5.0

Online now
- 116 obsequient monuments, studies, maps
- 116 geodesic azimuth intersections
- 116 alignment callup azimuth alignment & satellite photo images with monument dating and key information

https://t.co/OoFDlLMOGp

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

@EthicalSkeptic Speaking of earthquakes escalation, has anyone any clue as why :
> Nb of M2,5 - 4 quakes per month is so different btw USGS and EMSC database ?
> EMSC data show a sharp increasing trend since end of 2024 ?

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

Le déplacement du pôle nord géographique se concentre sur une zone de plus en plus restreinte au fil des semaines. Depuis 60 ans d'observation précise, jamais il n'a été si petit.

[Eric Tilton @cognitivecarbon]

Pole shift update 💈🐧:

The tightening in 2026 pole motion continues; we watch and wait. The linear move we were watching last week has broken, and there is finally a hook back toward the west.

The extent of pole movement data that we have only goes back 60 some years, so it's not possible to say how normal or abnormal 2026 is in the grand scheme of things; but relative to the data set we have, 2026 is anomalous (as @nobulart ' s phase diagram on https://t.co/euHbDcnGGp clearly shows.)

@zachariaspro contends that the anomaly is significant, as his recent replies to TES indicate.

When you look at prior behavior, at some point the "recent path" of the pole crosses back over a prior trace and the "wobble" starts to expand in diameter again. When will that happen next?

We'll keep watching...

To view this chart yourself:
https://t.co/eKA2c0AweH

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

@EthicalSkeptic Very interesting diagram.
Actually temp' and drift seem to decorrelate since approx' 2020. Will this trend last ?
(Pole drift calculated from NOAA position data : https://t.co/3n2rzEXGWb).

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

Sources des données :
- température : https://t.co/97uiD6IQPV
- dérive du pôle nord magnétique : déplacement annuel calculé à partir de la position annuelle référencée par le NOAA :
https://t.co/3n2rzEXGWb

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

Évolution de la température globale (écart par rapport à la moyenne sur la période 1850-1900)comparée à celle de la vitesse de dérive du pôle nord magnétique depuis 1850.
L'apparente corrélation est-elle une coïncidence ?
Sources des données : ⬇️

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

2/2
Ont été éliminées:
1/ La compression adiabatique
2/ la redistribution des courants AABW (AntArctic Bottom Waters) et celle liées aux variations de densités ("isopycnal heave")

Restent en lice :
- les sources géo/hydrothermiques
- l'induction électromagnétique

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

Suite des simulations réalisées par Stephanie Buchanan afin de cerner les causes principales des anomalies de températures observées dans les profondeurs abyssales.
⬇️

[Stephanie Buchanan @stephXskystory]

Ocean Heat Source 09: The dominant source is either a) geothermal/hydrothermal heating from below, or b) electromagnetic induction.

Here’s where I’m at with the five mechanisms I’m testing to explain the abyssal warming acceleration:

1. adiabatic compression: closed
2. isopycnal heave: quantified; observationally limited
3. AABW/overturning: closed as the dominant quantitative explanation
4. geothermal/hydrothermal: in progress, looking weak as the dominant explanation, closing two loopholes...
5. electromagnetic induction: solver in development, strongest remaining hypothesis

Two mechanisms closed. One ran into the limits of the observations. Two left to test...

We're closing in.

https://t.co/TXcVk4nVwn

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

@sunfellow @EthicalSkeptic However I don't see how this interpretation fits with "handbags" representations found on other monuments (such as the one on the above picture).

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

@sunfellow Regarding the "purses" or "handbags", @EthicalSkeptic suggests that the ones carved on Göbekli Tepe's pillar #43 represents hills ('Tepe'), more precisely hollowed out hills that would be used as shelters.
https://t.co/n2YkxUrOAj
⬇️

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

Un travail passionnant de modélisation afin de cerner quelles peuvent être les causes des anomalies de températures observées dans les couches abyssales des océans.

[Stephanie Buchanan @stephXskystory]

Ocean Heat Source 04: Now that I’ve pinned down the abyssal warming pattern, it’s time to investigate possible sources.

I’m working through five main possibilities:

1. Adiabatic compression : could the water only appear warmer because it moved deeper and got squeezed? This one is already looking weak.

2. Redistribution and isopycnal heave: could density layers be moving up and down and shifting existing heat around?

3. Antarctic Bottom Water and overturning: could changing deep ocean circulation be carrying warmer water into the abyss?

4. Geothermal and hydrothermal heating : could heat be entering from the seafloor, ridges, or vents?

5. Electromagnetic induction and ohmic heating: could changing magnetic fields drive electric currents, and could enough of that electrical energy turn into heat?

I’ll need my electromagnetic solver to finish that last test.

Now, we get to see which mechanisms survive testing.

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

@mac_koi @decoder_l Merci Christine de prendre le temps de "challenger" Pierre.
Je trouve ces échanges très révélateurs et, pour le moment, les "absurdités" que vous évoquiez au sujet des propos de Pierre sont loin de m'apparaître flagrantes.

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

Listes de contributeurs réguliers concernant l'étude de la théorie ECDO (discussions, modélisations, recoupement avec des travaux antérieurs,...)

[Thomas Burwell @golgoonza]

Who should you follow for updates on the ECDO pole-shift theory?
@ethicalskeptic - creator of the theory, frequent posts about ECDO
@nobulart - Craig Stone - extensive ECDO research regarding geological and archaeological evidence
@junhoBTC - inundation modeling, worked with Craig on historical scientific research
@zachariaspro - Zach - expert modeling of the wobble in Earth's orientation
@Kitsune_in_VA - Tami - historical and scientific researcher
@MethuselasMuse - creator of ecdo-prep website, models geophysical motion
@cognitivecarbon - Eric - excellent scientific analysis
@OMApproach - Ancient civilization researcher and meme creator
@BraveCatGamer - Frontier Signals website and Youtube Channel creator
@sunfellow - David - regularly summarizes the latest research updates
@ahfultz - close monitoring of changes of the wobble in Earth's orientation
@HamEggsnSam - host of the must-see live Q&A involving Ethical Skeptic, Craig, and Zach - https://t.co/C9EvJmxdB3

List any who I missed in the comments!
(This list focuses on ECDO theory, and so for the sake of brevity, does NOT include Ben Davidson's similar Solar-instigated cataclysm theory.)

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

Roger Cunningham (Ethical Skeptic) suggère que les figures en "H" de Gobekli Tepe représentent l'orientation du Soleil avant et après le basculement du pôle géographique (Np -> Np' - cf. sa théorie ECDO)
@Bam_JayanFilms

[Methuselah @MethuselasMuse]

Image 1- @EthicalSkeptic makes a very compelling case in his analysis of Gobekli Tepe that the "H" turned ~90 degrees represents the sun changing the place of its rising ~90 degrees.

That they should be used to mark the rising of the sun in inferred from their prominence "sighting stones" which included a narrow pinhole, constraining the view to a small point on the horizon, image credit again to @EthicalSkeptic

The third image is from Bolivia, the "H" blocks used at Puma Punku, an ECDO Np' aligned site. Curious that.

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

L'intensité d'El Niño serait-elle liée à la vitesse de déplacement du pôle nord magnétique ?

[Open Minded Approach @OMApproach]

Pay attention! The sharp rise in global ocean temperature in 1997–1998 was driven by the strongest recorded El Niño in history. So what caused this?

Just take a look at the jump in the speed of the Pole Shift recorded by NOAA in 1997! This is when the speed of the Pole Shift dramatically increased to 50 km per year, equivalent to the speed during the Laschamp Geomagnetic Excursion! This is what drives climate change, and today, in my opinion, the strong El Niño is occurring because there is currently another increase in the speed of the Pole Shift, and things are about to get really weird.

Now the deception and gaslighting will be greater than ever, the division will increase, and the elites will pour more money into AI and their doomsday bunkers.

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

@stephXskystory @DemiClawOne Thank you for this precious clarification :-)
I had misunderstood when you wrote "I first tested Roger’s depth-normalized"(__Ocean Heat Source 02__) : I thought that, you too, had done some "normalization".

Now I have to think about the meaning of your calculation...

[Jeronimmo Catacycle @Jeronimmo_CC]

@DemiClawOne @stephXskystory I quite agree w/ Demi. To "normalize" one need to dispatch both heat contents and water volumes below 5,000 among the bands above. Which "receipe" did Roger apply ? Which one did you apply ? I cannot figure it out.
Roger did not explain (asked him twice in '25). Will you? Thks.