@space_audits Ahh good. A retraction or at least partial retraction on the Celestial Theodolite would be cool too, now that Astronomy Live "Reversed the error differences." https://t.co/uNaPmXImwE
@RealAceFox1@VWolf83864177@WheresWal11y @BruisedFerret I figure it must be hybrid power generation, it's made to get energy from both the wind and the waves.
Thank you all! Here's the original video link: https://t.co/lJ2YFOthHu
And here's Roohif's analysis: https://t.co/t0GJCbe26C
If there were 13 meter ocean swells out there the spray on the ships would be seen, the the ship would be going up and down, not just always down. Curve!
@WheresWal11y Thanks! I've been seeing the single frame passed around which is super cool, I didn't know there was a whole video to with, so I'm very happen now because some flat earthers tell me it was ocean swells and it just happened to have one ship up and the other down. HA!
Hey what more can you tell me about this video of the nearby ship going past a half sunk container ship? Who filmed it? Observer location? Full length video on YT? Date and time? It's a GREAT example of globe earth being a globe! Thanks!
@sly_sparkane@space_audits Yeah like the most fantastic refutal yet - occluding a star behind a jetliner, and they just quietly retire the argument. If they honestly think the argument survived that refutation, they should do a few more episodes so it can reclaim its title! CT Busted!
@space_audits Yes, 36 weeks, only to be put to rest by Astronomy Live who occluded a star behind a jetplane and "reversed the errors." https://t.co/uNaPmXImwE
@RoundEarthGod @Mctoon27 I have not. But the celtheo is kind of RIP. Astronomy Live occluded some stars off of flying airplanes, and it "reversed the error offsets," and since Alan had said if that happened he'd be arguing against all the flaters, he kind of dropped the argument. https://t.co/uNaPmXImwE
@theoofcat5 @taylervee_ @ken_caudle 4thly, I highly commend Tayler for her effort in this project, she did her best to measure and record, doing something no amateur glober has ever done, reporting all locations and raw values even though some of them match globe closer. Who else in FE does that? Good job Tayler!
@theoofcat5 @taylervee_ @ken_caudle Thirdly, yes, it was definitely a top-heavy density gradient as you said, and yes these drop off exponentially with elevation, and yes the refraction values were very extreme and varying and not matching flat OR globe when compared to elevation angles measured.
@theoofcat5 @taylervee_ @ken_caudle Secondly, yes, mistakes were made, the two sensors should have been up higher, centered around the line of sight. We all make mistakes, as you well know from your massive field experience measuring drop over distance... if any... I know from experience https://t.co/IrD9UtmYTq
@theoofcat5 @taylervee_ @ken_caudle 1st, as a glober, let me say that you gotta admit that it's massive impressive that Tayler actually flew a drone with two temperature loggers suspended at different vertical elevations along the line of sight when measuring with a theodolite. Can you name 1 glober who did? KUDOS!
@theoofcat5 @taylervee_ @ken_caudle looks like we may have changed the temps and forgot to recalculate the IOR. I vaguely recall there was some confusion in my mind about which gradient measurement went with which test site, and I vaguely remember changing up the temperatures, but the IOR's are from old temp.
@theoofcat5 @taylervee_ @ken_caudle As I recall, I used https://t.co/7udxHKfxOI or a javascript implementation of it built into one of my spreadsheets for calculating ray bending.
Can you be specific about what is not credible about the Index or Refraction listed? It is possible that I made a data entry error.
@space_audits Alan himself debunked it here when he admits that it gives error results due to built in globe assumptions in stellarium! https://t.co/pi6ZEubUAj
@taylervee_ I'm not sure what planet vid you're asking about, but the only planet video I see on my youtube is Jupiter with my P1000 in 4K mode: https://t.co/29kce2Jdsn
Yeah, the Celestial Theodolite is a huge fraud at this point
Using their CT method, the results are all over the board, sometimes close to flat, sometimes matching globe, sometimes concave, sometimes tiny globe. Completely meaningless.
But the globe model predicts it every time