@j_fishback What?! I didn’t know you went to BA… I grew up in Weston, and went to BA. I bet we had some of the same teachers… Ms Hopper? Dr Milton? Mr Kalmer?
@Cernovich@chamath@chamath definitely purports to (via his investments in energy & biotech); although (1) depends on what would meet your criteria for “at scale” (side projects vs. dedication of one’s entire existence) and (2) chamath is a “little-b” billionaire
@Jason@LAUNCH@KauffmanFellows@Jason I understand this is predominantly geared towards young people (as it should be), but are you open to considering late-30’s career-switchers? I’m a 10/10 in hunger + ambition + work ethic.
@JAS1961@DrAlmarielao You don’t have to remove the other person. Husband can just create a new account in his name alone, and transfer all the funds from the joint accounts.
As I see it; the marketplace of ideas is oversaturated on that issue.
The seldom-discussed idea you touched on in your initial response more so has to do with WHY there is such a demand in the marketplace for Tucker’s message of deconstructing Israel’s influence on America from the perspective of Christian men, and how this message is not fundamentally incompatible with supporting the president in Iran.
Your initial response is actually the first perspective I’ve ever seen to coherently integrate the two.
@Jaber_Algayal@PBDsPodcast Nearly 100% of the public is binary on these issues: Either they’re dealbreakers, or they’re not.
If you fall in the camp where they are NOT dealbreakers (ie You, Pat), 99.999% are likely to oppose Tucker, and are thus unable to access the nuance articulated in your comment.
@Jaber_Algayal@PBDsPodcast In the domain of Trump’s policy & posture toward Iran.
The 1-2 punch uniquely responsible for fracturing the Trump coalition is “Release Epstein Files” (1) + “No New Foreign Wars” (2).
100% of the daylight between Tucker & Trump is downstream of the above.
@Jaber_Algayal@PBDsPodcast Phenomenal analysis. Bottom line: Tucker=Macro, Pat=Micro. What makes this feedback especially potent & thoughtful is the fact that - due to your own experiences - your personal conclusions are more aligned with Pat > Tucker.
@DataRepublican@JamesTate121 Exactly!! And, you meant “defecting,” although he will most certainly *deflect* in response to your comment (if he responds at all)
@LibertyLockPod@AIPAC@MassieforKY They know he will win. The amount of money spent against him is to discourage anybody else from doing what he’s doing, because very few can do what Massie does.