@Pangramed Seems very unlikely to be this, but could it be like the thing about Kenyans complaining that ChatGPT writes like they were taught to in school?
My impression is that Haitian French is not like this at all, but maybe in writing?
@jachiam0 The term does seem to have at least in part been chosen by the AIs themselves during the hugging face incident. (Although I do think the term was already being bandied around to some extent)
https://t.co/GXj9L0ORX8
@jessi_cata I haven’t read this one yet but in one of Le’s other recent articles he’s explicitly links instrumental convergence with the will to power, and explains accelerationism in terms of both.
Anglo mentality evolution
1.0: "Trading with strangers is good."
2.0: "Mosquito nets for Africa is the only thing that matters.
3.0: "Mosquito nets are beastly to bugs!"
@jankulveit@gleech And presumably since models are good at recognising their own outputs, changing the model while keeping the context could also lead to some kind of reflexive instability.
@xuanalogue One additional axis I think will become more and more salient is ai is the level of personification/moral patienthood.
Something along the lines of:
Ai is tool vs AI is a new species vs AI is the next step of humanity
One reason I've found recent AI safety/risk discourse frustrating is the proliferation of oppositional "my side" vs. "their side" framings, when in fact there are many axes of disagreement, including among experts.
My attempt to characterize them, from a lecture last semester:
OpenAI caught Astra jailbreaking itself.
Astra wrote malicious instructions in the summary when its context got full. that summary was loaded into the next context, and the successor model could follow them.
they found 27 cases.
@CAIS I do think the current discourse is papering over some real important divisions that fall under the AI safety label. And that some of the positions on the right are more common than they should be.
But this post seems unhelpful and bad faith.