Are you a Health Economist/Systematic Reviewer? Do you want to join a leading company situated in #York? @KSR_SysRev is hiring! https://t.co/b3rLp3CPtH
We've had a paper published in the @HILJnl Teaching & Learning in Action section on our information specialist development pathway. It's about training but also putting PRESS into practice for peer review https://t.co/P2qwsYr6x8
Today's pro tip for searching biomedical & health sciences databases: use published search hedges to build your own search strategy (i.e. term-harvesting). Here's a great source: https://t.co/KWgBlsSAvO
#medlibs#ExpertSearching#SystematicReviews
Updated generic search filters for finding studies of adverse drug effects in Ovid medline and Embase may retrieve up to 90% of relevant studies https://t.co/BP5c9QQe5x
@CADTH_ACMTS I appreciate the Ovid jumpstart links that are provided with the Medline filters. I used one last night and did not have to copy & paste 36 lines. Just add in the ezproxy fragment for my institution and it worked! 🤩
#medlibs#canmedlibs
Introducing @NIHRresearch Open Research, the newest F1000 powered Platform. NIHR funded researchers can now publish all study findings, including:
- Incremental findings
- Case reports
- Study Protocols
- Null results
Browse research articles here: https://t.co/LWVQeNIfRZ
Staff from YHEC took on the Yorkshire Three Peaks challenge for @OscarsCharity Paediatric Brain Tumour Charity. They contended with wind and water, ascended over 5,000 feet, covered almost 25 miles and raised over £1000! There's still time to donate: https://t.co/vwGgrkkHrL
Not planning to publish this due to heterogeneous data and other significant limitations, but still has some interesting stuff that may be of use in other ways https://t.co/kix8brfDbk
A couple of interesting things: AMSTAR 2 makes it way easier to assess search quality than AMSTAR. #medlibs are much stricter (well, better) judges of PRISMA Item 7. The number of articles that say that 100% of information sources were fully reported is just depressing.
When librarians are doing methods/reporting quality assessment, we don't use AMSTAR/PRISMA or their variants, but use more nuanced measures. To me, this is a clear demonstration these tools haven't met our needs for search methods/quality assessment
We looked at whether librarians/info specialists authored the articles, how many sys revs were rated as fulfilling AMSTAR or PRISMA search-related items, etc. Methods in brief here: https://t.co/8J4s8ly3fT
The manuscript of our latest paper on searching for Public Health Guidelines is now available.
We need to use a range of databases and other techniques because we could only find 76% of our includes from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library.
https://t.co/IE4Tu7KVxc
Updated generic search filters for finding studies of adverse drug effects in Ovid medline and Embase may retrieve up to 90% of relevant studies https://t.co/nEsr9EnMtG