Thrilled is an understatement! This pilot grant provides us with the resources we need to figure out how we can better implement effective IPV interventions in community/corrections settings. Huge shout-out to our community partners who are so integral to this work!
Congratulations to Lucy Bilaver, Katherine Collison, and Faraz Ahmad on being awarded 2023 Translational Science Pilot Awards โ https://t.co/RLudu99auW
Colin is an AMAZING mentor and does really interesting work on antagonism - 10/10 would recommend applying to work with him if your research interests align!
I want to spread the word that Iโll be looking to interview potential clinical PhD students this cycle! Weโll work on understanding antagonistic traits/behaviors and related interpersonal processes (among other things). Bonus: youโd join a fantastic dept in my fave city 1/3
Excited to share a new paper from me, @drl4567 and @JMill_er providing further support for how the triarchic psychopathy model is embedded in the five-factor model using a variety of criterion measures - pre-print and data available here: https://t.co/O9fp7CS8Oy
Grateful for the opportunity to write something that might be a helpful resource to new parents and people who are struggling with postpartum depression and anxiety.
In her Clinical Science Insights paper, Kate Collison, Ph.D. provides an overview of the physical and emotional changes that take place during and after pregnancy, information about postpartum depression, and resources for parents. Read the full paper: https://t.co/QKeKEkUEYw
Excited to share that I've accepted a research faculty position @tfinu starting in September! Happy to continue our work on implementing effective IPV interventions while also teaching and seeing clients ๐ฅณ
@AllisonKFarrell Agreed with @BrentWRoberts about how much is gained from looking at the facet-level; that said, if you're dealing with limitations in terms of timing and number of items, I'd also recommend the 30-item Five Factor Model Rating Form: https://t.co/WQ9RsS4VG6
@MadisonSheaSmit@LouisTaySC@DBsamuel_phd Wowowow first of all CONGRATS and second of all, I am *so* excited to read this because it's something I've been thinking about a lot lately. Might end up picking your brain more about it at some point!
@JMill_er It's surprising to me that anyone thinks they can take the moral high ground after using such a sensationalized, problematic title to describe their work. I agree with others, you all had some valid critiques and this response is absurd.
@CourtlandHyatt@AmandaKMontoya Similar to this idea, I recently read a paper that had a footnote for one specific section that just said something along the lines of, "We appreciated a reviewer's suggestion that we add this analysis." Short, to the point, and keeps things transparent/positive!