I am the Gen-X Journalist. Remote Viewer. Metaphysics & UFO enthusiast. Admittedly more excited about the Magnetic Pole Shift Global Cataclysm than I should be.
@SusanMills158 You love that in addition to having terminal liberal cancer, you also have stage 4 stupid as fuck? That is stupid as fuck, but you do have stage 4 stupid as fuck, so it tracks.
ROBO CHOMO 3000 attacks child at Pride Parade. With all the Child Sexual Abuse fantasies Liberals share with AI, they have programmed robots for violence against kids.
INSIDER INFO: AI, Data Centers, and the Future of Population Control
A source with ties to the intelligence community warned me that the present purpose of Data Centers and AI infrastructure is not convenience, productivity, or economic growth.
According to the source, the real objective is "remote" behavioral command and control at population scale.
Prior to this conversation, I had been intuiting that the explosive construction of AI Data Centers had more to do with CERN and the development of an emerging technological architecture than with simply generating better chatbots, images, or search results. While that intuition may not be entirely incorrect, I was told that these facilities will serve another function first.
The claim is that once sufficient AI processing capacity exists, it could be paired with technologies already distributed throughout society, specifically nanotechnology introduced into human populations through the COVID-19 vaccine, creating the ability to remotely trigger coordinated human behavior on a massive scale.
In this scenario, riots would not emerge organically.
Violence would not spread naturally.
Entire populations could be induced into synchronized violent action and psychosis, producing the appearance of spontaneous civil unrest while operating under algorithmic direction.
What appears to be a social movement could, according to this theory, be something else entirely.
What appears to be outrage is activation.
What appears to be chaos is orchestration.
The source further claimed that as automation and artificial intelligence eliminate the economic usefulness of large segments of the population, factions within global power structures view mass depopulation as preferable to permanent economic support systems.
This perspective is rooted in a simple and uncomfortable economic reality.
Artificial Intelligence does not sleep.
It does not unionize.
It does not require healthcare.
It does not retire.
It does not demand wages.
As increasingly capable AI systems replace human labor across multiple industries, a question emerges that few people appear willing to discuss openly:
What becomes of billions of people whose labor is no longer economically necessary?
For decades, futurists have proposed Universal Basic Income as the solution.
The source suggested something very different.
According to this view, High-Level Universal Income would not be extended to the population at large. It would be reserved for a select few deemed useful, compliant, connected, or otherwise necessary to the maintenance of the emerging system.
The remainder would become an increasingly expensive burden on a civilization optimized for machine productivity.
The source's warning reminded me of a quote often attributed to Jay Gould:
"I can hire one half of the poor to kill the other half."
Throughout history, power has often been maintained by directing the frustrations of ordinary people toward one another rather than toward the structures above them.
The theory presented to me suggests a future iteration of that principle, one no longer requiring propaganda alone, but potentially assisted by advanced technology operating at scales previously unimaginable.
The ideological divides have reached the point of being irreconcilable.
The vaccine was made into a political statement and virtue signal, ensuring that half of the American public would reliably, with high degrees of certainty, possess advanced mind-altering and behavior-manipulating technology capable of being driven to violence against those it already sees as the biggest threat to its existence, and done so en masse.
Blanketing our country in powerful 6G, staked down by nationwide Data Centers, would be how this long-seeming, long-running plan to create a "purge" scenario in the United States would be implemented.
-Kevin Wikse