BITCOIN DIY SIGNING DEVICE THREAD
Here I'll keep track of the various complete DIY signing devices and their relevant repositories which contain essential info for acquiring parts, assembling, and flashing.
BITCOIN DIY SIGNING DEVICE THREAD
Here I'll keep track of the various complete DIY signing devices and their relevant repositories which contain essential info for acquiring parts, assembling, and flashing.
@Nme1ess2@SamouraiWallet@SparrowWallet Yes. If you're going to use bitcoin bought with KYC as an initial deposit on Bisq, use a Whirlpool post-mix output so that it can't be traced back to your identity.
@SamouraiWallet @btccamper So the argument is 5 mobile users and 5 addresses from known xpubs on the input side, 4 addresses from known xpubs on the output side. So that remaining 1 is obvious.
@FullyOrange@SeedSigner@jokoono@revetuzo Absolutely it requires trust in the manufacturer. I would rather build my own signing device with general purpose hardware, which is why I use a SeedSigner.
@carlucci7777@btc_gorilla@SamouraiWallet It doesn't really affect me because I can use Sparrow and my own Dojo node, yes. I'm excited about this for those who can't.
@SeedSigner@jokoono@revetuzo BitBox02 does have good defense against this in that they put their signing key in the device when it's manufactured, so malicious firmware couldn't be installed on it. If I'm remembering correctly.
@jokoono@SeedSigner@revetuzo Do any wallets (coordinators) not validate that the signed tx coming back from the signing device doesn't match the unsigned tx that was sent to it?
@jokoono@SeedSigner@revetuzo Yep, this is why it's important to have a Bitcoin-only machine, which would severely limit the chances of it getting infected with such malware.
@SamouraiWallet @snitchy_asc This would be very cool, especially if the timing isn't important. On the receiving end, I would want the output to go to my post-mix account so that it can continue remixing and I get post-mix spending tools.